Discover Narcity
Get the latest and greatest stories every day in your inbox.
Officials to provide update on fatal fire at CFB Wainwright in Alberta
Officials to provide update on CFB Wainwright fire
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout — Canadian Armed Forces (Mandatory credit)
Officials are set to provide an update today about a devastating fire at a Canadian military base in Alberta that left four soldiers dead and dozens more injured.
Maj.-Gen. Wade Rutland of the 1st Canadian Division has said Saturday's blaze began as a grass fire, but a violent windstorm sent flames racing toward soldiers training at Canadian Forces Base Wainwright.
The fire initially sent 39 wounded to various hospitals, and officials said Wednesday that number was down to 27, with 13 in critical condition.
Roughly 150 people attended a vigil late Wednesday at a church in the nearby town of Wainwright, Alta., southeast of Edmonton.
Prayers were said, songs were sung and the names of those killed were read aloud, followed by a moment of silence.
Mayor Bruce Pugh says the last few days have been tough, but activities at the base have started to return to normal.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 22. 2026.
Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Keep reading
Show less
Lower courts' reasoning 'neuters' Emergencies Act, government tells Supreme Court
Courts' reasoning 'neuters' Emergencies Act: feds
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang
The federal government says the courts engaged in "second-guessing with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight" when they ruled it lacked legal justification to use the Emergencies Act four years ago to quell protests.
Lawyers for the government make the argument in a submission seeking a Supreme Court of Canada hearing of the federal case for invoking the emergencies law to deal with protest actions in the national capital and at key border points.
The top court is slated to rule Thursday on whether to grant the government leave to appeal.
For about three weeks in January and February 2022, downtown Ottawa was filled with protesters, including many in large trucks that blocked streets around Parliament Hill.
While many protesters demonstrated against COVID-19 health restrictions, the "Freedom Convoy" protests also attracted some with a variety of grievances against then-prime minister Justin Trudeau and his government.
Trucks also jammed key border crossings to the United States, including routes at Windsor, Ont., and Coutts, Alta.
On Feb. 14, 2022, the government invoked the Emergencies Act, which allowed for temporary measures, including regulation and prohibition of public assemblies, the designation of secure places, direction to banks to freeze assets, and a ban on support for protest participants.
It was the first time the law had been used since it replaced the War Measures Act in 1988.
In a Feb. 15 letter to premiers, Trudeau said the federal government believed it had reached a point "where there is a national emergency arising from threats to Canada's security.''
The Public Order Emergency Commission, which carried out a mandatory review after the act was used, concluded in early 2023 that the federal government had met the very high legal standard for using the law.
The Trudeau government's move was also scrutinized in Federal Court.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and several other groups and individuals argued that Ottawa lacked sound statutory grounds to deploy the emergency measures.
The government said the steps taken to deal with the turmoil were targeted, proportional and time-limited, and complied with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Richard Mosley, the Federal Court judge who heard the case, concluded the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act did not bear the hallmarks of reasonableness — justification, transparency and intelligibility — and was not supported in relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints.
Ultimately, there "was no national emergency justifying the invocation of the Emergencies Act," Mosley said in his January 2024 ruling.
In January of this year, a three-judge panel of the Federal Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed that ruling.
The Court of Appeal said that as disturbing and disruptive as the blockades and the "Freedom Convoy" protests in Ottawa could be, "they fell well short of a threat to national security."
In its written submission requesting a Supreme Court hearing, the government says the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal "applied the wrong principles on judicial review."
The courts should have asked whether — based on the information available at the time — federal officials acted reasonably in concluding a public order emergency existed, the submission says.
"Instead, they asked, with the benefit of hindsight, whether there were reasonable grounds to believe that a public order emergency existed."
In the end, both courts applied their own view of what was reasonable, the government says.
"This non-deferential approach hamstrings governments' ability to respond effectively to future crises, neuters the Act" and conflicts with the Supreme Court's administrative law rulings over the years, the submission says.
"It amounts to second-guessing with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight," the government adds.
"In the end, no one disputes that emergency measures should be a temporary means of last resort. But that does not mean those measures should be available only in the most dire and extreme circumstances."
In its submission to the Supreme Court, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association says the government should be denied leave to appeal because it is attempting to relitigate "the same issues and arguments the Court of Appeal dismissed."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 22, 2026.
By Jim Bronskill | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Keep reading
Show less
Alleged Tumbler Ridge mass shooting conspirator set to enter plea in U.S. court
Tumbler Ridge conspiracy suspect set to enter plea
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Lois Silver
The alleged co-conspirator in the mass shooting in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., is expected to enter a plea at an arraignment in a Seattle courthouse today.
A grand jury in Washington state last week indicted 30-year-old James Bryant for conspiracy to murder persons in a foreign country.
The criminal complaint against Bryant, who uses female pronouns and goes by the name Melody, alleges she colluded with shooter Jesse Van Rootselaar online, helping set up an attempted livestream of the murders.
The complaint says Bryant also advised 18-year-old Van Rootselaar on where to carry out the attack and sent the shooter money to buy a lighter for an explosive device.
Van Rootselaar killed eight victims last February, including five students and an educational assistant at the local secondary school, before she fatally shot herself as police closed in.
Bryant has been denied bail.
A statement from the U.S. Justice Department says conspiracy to murder in a foreign country is punishable by up to life in prison.
It cautions that the accusations against Bryant remain unproven.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 22, 2026.
By Brenna Owen | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Keep reading
Show less
Cette femme a trouvé la réponse parfaite aux commentaires désagréables des hommes
Un petit commentaire « innocent » par ici et une autre remarque « flatteuse » par-là : le harcèlement est toujours aussi présent, malgré tous les efforts de sensibilisation déployés.
À lire aussi :
15 choses que tu dois te donner le droit de faire sans te justifier à personne
7 pensées que tu avais à 11 ans que tu devrais te permettre d’avoir aujourd’hui
Alors qu’il est presque impossible pour une femme de passer une seule semaine sans recevoir des commentaires sur son apparence physique, FeministaJones a trouvé une méthode assez originale pour répondre aux commentaires disgracieux et faire taire (ou même insulter) les hommes qui lui adressent ces messages.
Sa technique est simple mais totalement efficace : approuver les commentaires de ces hommes afin de les tourner au ridicule.
Piss a man off today : Tell him you agree with his compliment of you.
12 mai 2017
Pour une drôle de raison, les hommes restent généralement sans mot, ou sont tous simplement insultés. Des phrases comme « belle shape » se transforment en « finalement tu devrais hit le gym plus souvent, je voulais juste être gentil ».
Le fait d'approuver le commentaire te rend narcissique à leurs yeux, et donc d'un coup moins belle. Mais on va se le dire, l'opinion d'un homme qui approche une fille avec un cat call, on s'en fou un peu, right?
@FeministaJones Random man on street: "Damn, you're gorgeous."
Me: "Thank you, I know!"
Rando: "Oh it's like THAT, huh?"
FUCK YES IT'S LIKE THAT, BRUH 💁
16 mai 2017
@FeministaJones LOL one of my fave past times since college:
Dude: "You're beautiful"
Me: "I know."
Dude: "!!! ugly bitch"
Like, I have a mirror lol byee
12 mai 2017
@FeministaJones EVERYTIME!
DUDE: You look nice today.
ME: Thank you! I completely agree...
DUDE: pic.twitter.com/zDc9Ez6xMw
12 mai 2017
@FeministaJones I responded "I know" to a compliment once, and the guy got soooooo nasty afterwards
12 mai 2017
J'ai tenté l'expérience, pour la cause, sur Tinder. Le résultat, pour ma part, fut peu divertissant, mais assez révélateur: des unmatchs soudains. Les hommes ne sont tout simplement pas prêts à recevoir un « je le sais » au lieu d'un « merci ».
Une chose est certaine, je vais définitivement l'essayer dans la rue. Évidemment, on utilise cette technique pour les personnes désagréables, et non gentilles.
Autres articles qui pourraient aussi t'intéresser:
14 Québécois racontent leurs pires dates Tinder et le résultat va solidement te turn off
10 fois où Chuck Bass m'a redonné confiance en l'amour
14 personnes dévoilent les secrets qui ruineraient leur vie s'ils étaient découverts