Discover Narcity
Get the latest and greatest stories every day in your inbox.
Certains Québécois peuvent se faire rembourser leur déneigement : Voici qui et comment
En plus de ne pas avoir à pelleter, t'as pas à payer en totalité! 🤑
L’hiver approche à grands pas et, pour plusieurs propriétaires, c’est déjà le temps de penser au contrat de déneigement. Mais savais-tu que certaines personnes peuvent récupérer jusqu’à 40 % de leur facture grâce à un crédit d’impôt de Revenu Québec? On t’explique qui peut en profiter en 2026 et comment en faire la demande.
À lire également : Voici quand tu devrais poser tes pneus d'hiver en 2026 au Québec selon un expert
Si tu ne connais pas le crédit d’impôt pour maintien à domicile des aînés, te voilà enfin présenté à cette mesure du fisc provincial destinée aux personnes de 70 ans et plus qui souhaitent continuer à vivre chez elles, même en pleine autonomie.
Selon la Chaire de recherche en fiscalité et en finances publiques (CFFP) de l’Université de Sherbrooke, cette aide financière s’adresse à plus de 500 000 personnes au Québec, selon des données de 2022.
Qui peut obtenir un remboursement pour son déneigement?
Pour être admissible, tu dois avoir 70 ans ou plus et résider au Québec à la fin de l’année. Pas besoin d’être en perte d’autonomie pour en profiter. Les personnes aînées autonomes y ont droit aussi, qu’elles soient propriétaires ou locataires.
Revenu Québec confirme que les services de déneigement et d'entretien du terrain sont admissibles, tout comme certains travaux extérieurs, notamment la pose et le retrait d'un abri saisonnier.
Les propriétaires de copropriétés peuvent également bénéficier du crédit pour les frais de déneigement inclus dans leurs charges communes.
Le crédit est remboursable, ce qui signifie que tu peux en profiter même si tu n'as aucun impôt à payer.
Combien peux-tu économiser?
En 2026, le crédit d'impôt représente 40 % des dépenses admissibles. Par exemple, pour un contrat de déneigement admissible de 500 $, tu pourrais récupérer 200 $. Une facture de 750 $ pourrait, quant à elle, donner droit à un crédit de 300 $.
Toutefois, le montant réellement accordé dépend notamment de ton revenu familial et des autres dépenses admissibles au programme.
Selon la CFFP, le crédit commence à diminuer lorsque le revenu familial dépasse 72 465 $ en 2026. Les règles de réduction varient toutefois selon le niveau d'autonomie.
En tout et partout, les dépenses annuelles admissibles sont également plafonnées à 19 500 $ pour une personne seule autonome et à 25 500 $ pour une personne seule non autonome. Cela représente des crédits d'impôt maximaux respectifs de 7 800 $ et de 10 200 $ en 2026, avant toute réduction liée au revenu.
Ces plafonds concernent l'ensemble des services admissibles au maintien à domicile, et non uniquement le déneigement.
Comment réclamer le crédit d'impôt?
Deux possibilités s'offrent à toi : réclamer le crédit dans ta déclaration de revenus du Québec, en remplissant l'annexe J, ou demander des versements anticipés auprès de Revenu Québec.
Pour les propriétaires de maisons qui souhaitent recevoir leur crédit à l'avance, il faut remplir le formulaire TPZ-1029.MD.9 ou utiliser les services en ligne de Revenu Québec.
Tu as jusqu'au 1er décembre 2026 pour demander des versements anticipés pour cette année. Ceux-ci sont versés directement dans ton compte bancaire. Assure-toi de conserver tes factures et tes pièces justificatives.
Quelles sont les autres dépenses admissibles?
Il faut savoir d'emblée que ce ne sont pas tous les frais qui sont admissibles, aux yeux de Revenu Québec. Ceux qui le sont, outre le déneigement et l'entretien paysager, varient selon l’endroit où vit la personne. Voici quelques exemples :
En maison ou en copropriété
- Entretien ménager ;
- Livraison d’épicerie et de repas ;
- Aide à l’hygiène et à l’habillage ;
- Services infirmiers et soins personnels ;
- Travaux mineurs d’entretien et de réparation.
En logement locatif
- Un montant correspondant à 5 % du loyer mensuel est automatiquement considéré comme une dépense admissible ;
- Le loyer pris en compte est d’au moins 600 $ et d’au plus 1 200 $ par mois ;
- Les services non inclus dans le loyer, comme le ménage, le déneigement, la livraison d’épicerie ou les soins à domicile, peuvent être ajoutés séparément.
En résidence privée pour personnes aînées
- Une portion importante du loyer ;
- Les services de repas ;
- L’entretien ménager;
- Les soins infirmiers et l’aide personnelle.
Pour connaître toutes les conditions et vérifier ton admissibilité, consulte le site officiel de Revenu Québec.
Keep reading
Show less
N.L. faces ‘serious liability questions’ over Ithaca Energy’s entry into province’s oil sector, legal expert warns
Ithaca’s majority owner, Delek Group, is blacklisted by the UN over alleged human rights concerns.
The provincial government doesn’t intend to stop Ithaca Energy’s entry into Newfoundland and Labrador’s oil sector despite the company’s ties to Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian territory.
Ithaca is majority-owned by Israeli energy conglomerate Delek Group, which is blacklisted by the United Nations for its alleged role in “activities that raised particular human rights concerns.”
On Wednesday Wakeham said he won’t comment on Ithaca’s “political things,” and that the company’s involvement in the province’s oil and gas sector “bodes well for our industry.”
His comments come nearly a week after provincial Energy Minister Lloyd Parrot did not answer questions from The Independent about what the PC government will do, if anything, in response to Ithaca’s takeover of Canadian oil company Suncor’s stakes in the Terra Nova, White Rose and West White Rose offshore oil projects.
Human rights advocates say the impending acquisition should be stopped, while a legal expert says the federal and provincial governments – as well as Suncor and provincial crown corporation OilCo – face legal risks if they fail to intervene.
“Gaza has been razed. Families have been erased, children have been starved and buried under rubble, and the West Bank is being cleared village by village,” local Palestinian solidarity group Palestine Action YYT told The Independent in a statement. “Newfoundlanders and Labradorians did not build an offshore industry to underwrite that. Not one barrel of our oil should pad the profits of anyone tied to apartheid and ethnic cleansing.”
Michael Bueckert, vice president of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) – one of the country’s leading voices speaking out against Israel’s war and occupation in the occupied Palestinian territories – calls Ithaca’s acquisition “unacceptable” and wants political leaders to step in.
“As the International Court of Justice has determined, our political leaders are obliged to avoid economic dealings with companies involved in Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine,” he said in a statement to The Independent.
“This underscores the urgent need for Canada to intervene and impose comprehensive sanctions to stop all economic trade with those who profit from and facilitate Israel’s illegal settlements.”
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Delek Group is providing “services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements, including transport,” and of using “natural resources, in particular water and land, for business purposes.”
The Independent sent questions to Delek Group but did not hear back.
Carney needs to clarify commitment to sanctions
In September, Prime Minister Mark Carney committed to banning trade in goods with Israel’s settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. “Settlements are illegal under international law,” he said at the time.
But details of Canada’s new sanctions have not yet been announced.
CJPME and others, including federal MP Heather McPherson – an outspoken critic of Canada’s relations with Israel amid what many argue amounts to Israel’s genocide against Palestinians – are calling on the Liberals to expand Canada’s sanctions against Israel and prohibit trade in services, too.
Heidi Matthews, an assistant professor of law at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto and an expert in international criminal law, says the Carney government needs to ensure its new policy is “comprehensive enough to capture things like federal and provincial procurement, and involvement in economic deals with corporations that in one way or another are engaged in illegal activity in occupied Palestine.”
The Independent reached out to Global Affairs Canada for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication.
Legal risks for governments, corporations: Professor
Matthews says Wakeham’s characterisation of Ithaca and Delek’s ties to Israel’s occupation of Palestine as ‘political things’ is “inattentive to the realities of their commercial dealings,” which, she says, “cannot – according to the evidence that’s been documented by the UN database – be disassociated from violations of international law.
“It is well established that the occupation of the Palestinian territory, including the West Bank, is unlawful because it violates the Palestinian right to self-determination, and also because it amounts to the acquisition of territory by the use of force, as well as systemic racial discrimination and apartheid. All of this was found by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its 2024 advisory opinion on the question.”
In December 2023, South Africa instituted proceedings at the ICJ, accusing Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians and violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. The court isn’t expected to render a decision until 2029 or 2030. In 2024, however, the court issued an advisory opinion on the “legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.”
The ICJ said Israel “has an obligation to bring an end to its presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible,” and “must immediately cease all new settlement activity.”
The court also said states dealing with Israel have a legal obligation to “take steps to prevent trade or investment relations that assist in the maintenance of the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In August, the federal government warned Canadian businesses that, “Engagement in, or connection to, settlement-related activities presents significant legal, financial and reputational risks [which] arise in part because, under international law, settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are not recognized as part of Israel’s territory.
“Activities may involve assets or resources subject to dispute and may expose businesses to increased scrutiny from investors, partners and civil society,” the advisory reads. “Businesses may also face disputes related to land, water, minerals or other natural resources associated with investments or transactions.”
Matthews points to the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2020 decision in Nevsun Resources Ltd. v Araya, which she says, “very clearly established that Canadian corporations can be held directly liable for violating these peremptory norms of international law, and that would include the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”
This means Suncor and Newfoundland and Labrador crown energy corporation OilCo could arguably face litigation, Matthews says. “But I do think the key question would be about whether or not the relationship between Suncor or OilCo. and Delek is too attenuated, by virtue of Ithaca in the middle. So whether doing business essentially with a company whose parent company is engaged in human rights violations – whether or not that’s a close enough link.”
Though states are legally bound to international law, including human rights law, states’ subnational jurisdictions could face legal consequences, too.
Matthews says Ithaca’s entry into the province’s oil sector raises “serious liability questions” for the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, “in the sense that under international law […] the actions of [provinces or territories] are still attributable to the central government itself.
“Canada has several obligations under international law, including to prevent trade or investment relations that assist in the maintenance of the occupation, which would include but not be limited to the settlement economy,” she continues. “So the provincial government also shares in that obligation.”
‘Silence is complicity,’ says local Palestine solidarity group
When asked Wednesday if he had the power to stop Ithaca’s acquisition of Suncor’s stakes in the oil projects, Wakeham said it’s “not something that I’m looking at.”
The premier said he is “focused on making sure that we have what the world needs, and we wanna make sure that if, as long as the world has a demand for oil, that Newfoundland and Labrador is part of that solution.”
“For Wakeham to say that somehow the province is not bound by international law with respect to its connection to, or involvement in, these violations shows a basic misunderstanding of provincial obligations under international law.”
Palestine Action YYT, which has held rallies, marches and other protest actions since 2023, says the federal government’s actions so far are inadequate, but pale in comparison to the provincial government’s. “Ottawa talks about banning settlement trade. Premier Wakeham and Minister Parrott won’t even say the word. Silence is complicity, and we won’t be silent,” the group says in its statement.
“We will resist this deal, and we expect oil and gas workers and their neighbours will stand with us.” The group says it is planning a public meeting in the near future, details of which will be announced this coming week. “Everyone who refuses to bankroll genocide is invited.”
With files from Kenny Sharpe.
Copyright 2026, The Independent. All rights reserved.
Justin Brake, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Independent.
Keep reading
Show less
N.L. faces ‘serious liability questions’ over Ithaca Energy’s entry into province’s oil sector, legal expert warns
Ithaca’s majority owner, Delek Group, is blacklisted by the UN over alleged human rights concerns.
The provincial government doesn’t intend to stop Ithaca Energy’s entry into Newfoundland and Labrador’s oil sector despite the company’s ties to Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian territory.
Ithaca is majority-owned by Israeli energy conglomerate Delek Group, which is blacklisted by the United Nations for its alleged role in “activities that raised particular human rights concerns.”
On Wednesday Wakeham said he won’t comment on Ithaca’s “political things,” and that the company’s involvement in the province’s oil and gas sector “bodes well for our industry.”
His comments come nearly a week after provincial Energy Minister Lloyd Parrot did not answer questions from The Independent about what the PC government will do, if anything, in response to Ithaca’s takeover of Canadian oil company Suncor’s stakes in the Terra Nova, White Rose and West White Rose offshore oil projects.
Human rights advocates say the impending acquisition should be stopped, while a legal expert says the federal and provincial governments – as well as Suncor and provincial crown corporation OilCo – face legal risks if they fail to intervene.
“Gaza has been razed. Families have been erased, children have been starved and buried under rubble, and the West Bank is being cleared village by village,” local Palestinian solidarity group Palestine Action YYT told The Independent in a statement. “Newfoundlanders and Labradorians did not build an offshore industry to underwrite that. Not one barrel of our oil should pad the profits of anyone tied to apartheid and ethnic cleansing.”
Michael Bueckert, vice president of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) – one of the country’s leading voices speaking out against Israel’s war and occupation in the occupied Palestinian territories – calls Ithaca’s acquisition “unacceptable” and wants political leaders to step in.
“As the International Court of Justice has determined, our political leaders are obliged to avoid economic dealings with companies involved in Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine,” he said in a statement to The Independent.
“This underscores the urgent need for Canada to intervene and impose comprehensive sanctions to stop all economic trade with those who profit from and facilitate Israel’s illegal settlements.”
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Delek Group is providing “services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements, including transport,” and of using “natural resources, in particular water and land, for business purposes.”
The Independent sent questions to Delek Group but did not hear back.
Carney needs to clarify commitment to sanctions
In September, Prime Minister Mark Carney committed to banning trade in goods with Israel’s settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. “Settlements are illegal under international law,” he said at the time.
But details of Canada’s new sanctions have not yet been announced.
CJPME and others, including federal MP Heather McPherson – an outspoken critic of Canada’s relations with Israel amid what many argue amounts to Israel’s genocide against Palestinians – are calling on the Liberals to expand Canada’s sanctions against Israel and prohibit trade in services, too.
Heidi Matthews, an assistant professor of law at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto and an expert in international criminal law, says the Carney government needs to ensure its new policy is “comprehensive enough to capture things like federal and provincial procurement, and involvement in economic deals with corporations that in one way or another are engaged in illegal activity in occupied Palestine.”
The Independent reached out to Global Affairs Canada for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication.
Legal risks for governments, corporations: Professor
Matthews says Wakeham’s characterisation of Ithaca and Delek’s ties to Israel’s occupation of Palestine as ‘political things’ is “inattentive to the realities of their commercial dealings,” which, she says, “cannot – according to the evidence that’s been documented by the UN database – be disassociated from violations of international law.
“It is well established that the occupation of the Palestinian territory, including the West Bank, is unlawful because it violates the Palestinian right to self-determination, and also because it amounts to the acquisition of territory by the use of force, as well as systemic racial discrimination and apartheid. All of this was found by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its 2024 advisory opinion on the question.”
In December 2023, South Africa instituted proceedings at the ICJ, accusing Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians and violating the 1948 Genocide Convention. The court isn’t expected to render a decision until 2029 or 2030. In 2024, however, the court issued an advisory opinion on the “legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.”
The ICJ said Israel “has an obligation to bring an end to its presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible,” and “must immediately cease all new settlement activity.”
The court also said states dealing with Israel have a legal obligation to “take steps to prevent trade or investment relations that assist in the maintenance of the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
In August, the federal government warned Canadian businesses that, “Engagement in, or connection to, settlement-related activities presents significant legal, financial and reputational risks [which] arise in part because, under international law, settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are not recognized as part of Israel’s territory.
“Activities may involve assets or resources subject to dispute and may expose businesses to increased scrutiny from investors, partners and civil society,” the advisory reads. “Businesses may also face disputes related to land, water, minerals or other natural resources associated with investments or transactions.”
Matthews points to the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2020 decision in Nevsun Resources Ltd. v Aray, which she says, “very clearly established that Canadian corporations can be held directly liable for violating these peremptory norms of international law, and that would include the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”
This means Suncor and Newfoundland and Labrador crown energy corporation OilCo could arguably face litigation, Matthews says. “But I do think the key question would be about whether or not the relationship between Suncor or OilCo. and Delek is too attenuated, by virtue of Ithaca in the middle. So whether doing business essentially with a company whose parent company is engaged in human rights violations – whether or not that’s a close enough link.”
Though states are legally bound to international law, including human rights law, states’ subnational jurisdictions could face legal consequences, too.
Matthews says Ithaca’s entry into the province’s oil sector raises “serious liability questions” for the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, “in the sense that under international law […] the actions of [provinces or territories] are still attributable to the central government itself.
“Canada has several obligations under international law, including to prevent trade or investment relations that assist in the maintenance of the occupation, which would include but not be limited to the settlement economy,” she continues. “So the provincial government also shares in that obligation.”
‘Silence is complicity,’ says local Palestine solidarity group
When asked Wednesday if he had the power to stop Ithaca’s acquisition of Suncor’s stakes in the oil projects, Wakeham said it’s “not something that I’m looking at.”
The premier said he is “focused on making sure that we have what the world needs, and we wanna make sure that if, as long as the world has a demand for oil, that Newfoundland and Labrador is part of that solution.”
“For Wakeham to say that somehow the province is not bound by international law with respect to its connection to, or involvement in, these violations shows a basic misunderstanding of provincial obligations under international law.”
Palestine Action YYT, which has held rallies, marches and other protest actions since 2023, says the federal government’s actions so far are inadequate, but pale in comparison to the provincial government’s. “Ottawa talks about banning settlement trade. Premier Wakeham and Minister Parrott won’t even say the word. Silence is complicity, and we won’t be silent,” the group says in its statement.
“We will resist this deal, and we expect oil and gas workers and their neighbours will stand with us.” The group says it is planning a public meeting in the near future, details of which will be announced this coming week. “Everyone who refuses to bankroll genocide is invited.”
With files from Kenny Sharpe.
Copyright 2026, The Independent. All rights reserved.
Justin Brake, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Independent.
Keep reading
Show less
7 « hacks » utiles au Maxi pour t'aider à économiser sur ton panier d'épicerie
Quand Maxi peut être ENCORE moins cher! 👀
Avec les prix des aliments qui font sourciller, il est bien normal de commencer à se tourner vers des façons plus créatives d'économiser à l'épicerie. Il existe une panoplie de trucs et même des applications qui te permettent de ne pas avoir à vider ton portefeuille en arrivant aux caisses.
Reconnue pour ses publicités hilarantes, la bannière Maxi est bien populaire chez les consommateur.trices, car elle propose souvent des prix réduits. Si tu aimes bien magasiner dans les allées de ton Maxi de quartier, voici quelques trucs faciles qui te permettront de sauver des sous lors de tes emplettes.
Le principe des imbattables du Maxi
Savais-tu que tu peux utiliser le principe des prix imbattables chez Maxi? Eh oui, ce n'est pas pour rien que cette chaîne d'épicerie se targue d'être « le panier le moins cher ».
Maxi s'engage à proposer les prix les plus bas possibles sur une sélection de produits alimentaires, de produits ménagers et d'autres articles de la vie quotidienne. Donc, si tu vois par exemple que les fraises sont en rabais chez Super C, mais pas chez Maxi, tu peux montrer ce rabais aux caisses et l'entreprise devra alors en modifier le prix.
Les applications Flipp ou Reebee pour t'aider à comparer les prix
Si tu ne sais pas trop comment faire ou qu'est-ce que ça mange en hiver « les imbattables », n'aie crainte, il existe maintenant des applications qui font la recherche pour toi!
Eh oui, Flipp et Reebee te permettent de voir rapidement les différents prix des produits dans les épiceries du Québec et effectue même la comparaison à ta place. Tu peux donc aisément entrer un produit dans la barre de recherche puis voir quelle épicerie propose le meilleur coût. Tu pourras ensuite montrer ton application à la caisse lorsque tu effectueras les imbattables au Maxi pour prouver que tu peux bien le trouver pour moins cher ailleurs.
L'application Flashfood
La société Loblaw Companies Limited, à qui appartient Maxi, a mis en place une application, Flashfood, qui permet à la fois de profiter d'aubaines en épicerie et de lutter contre le gaspillage alimentaire. Flashfood te permet de voir les produits qui approchent de leurs dates de péremption au Maxi, Provigo ou Loblaw près de chez toi, de les acheter via l'app puis d'aller les chercher dans les frigos du commerce. Faire des aubaines tout en aidant la planète, c'est toujours oui!
Regarder les circulaires
Les circulaires d'épicerie te permettent de voir rapidement les rabais et de préparer ta liste en avance. Pour économiser, tu peux donc commencer à regarder les circulaires, concevoir ta planification des repas de la semaine et tes achats en fonction des items en promotion. Trois étapes, certes, mais ça peut te permettre d'épargner chaque semaine. En plus, en sachant déjà tout ce dont tu as besoin, faire ton épicerie te prendra moins de temps.
Avoir un poulet rôti gratuit
Si tu te rends en succursale entre 15 h et 19 h et qu'il n'y a plus de poulet rôti dans le présentoir, tu peux te rendre à la caisse pour demander un coupon qui te permettra d'en avoir un gratuitement lors de ta prochaine visite. Un.e commis devra toutefois aller vérifier au préalable qu'il n'y a réellement plus aucun de ce poulet.
C'est d'ailleurs la même chose pour les baguettes de pain cuites sur place.
Privilégier les marques maison
Il peut être tentant d'acheter ta marque préférée de biscuits, de chips ou de tortilla, mais les marques maison des épiceries proposent bien souvent des prix réduits. Chez Maxi, tu pourras trouver les produits sans nom et Le Choix du Président.
Choisir avec soin ses produits
La page TikTok @eezly.quebec s'applique à effectuer une panoplie de tests en comparant le goût des différentes marques en épicerie. Ça peut donc être une bonne idée de visionner quelques vidéos pour t'aider à faire des choix plus rapidement. Parce qu'au final, si tu achètes un produit pas cher, mais qu'il finit dans ton congélateur durant deux ans, tu n'économises pas beaucoup d'argent.
Tu peux aussi visionner les tests de bouffe pour savoir si les marques maison compétitionnent avec les grandes compagnies, malgré leurs petits prix.