Discover Narcity
Get the latest and greatest stories every day in your inbox.
Caledon’s next mayor inherits a town divided over how far growth should go
Annette Groves retired after backlash over rezoning plans that opened the door to 35,000 homes.
On a chilly Monday at the beginning of October, Caledon resident Al Axworthy carefully drove past a line of trucks to one of the 12 parcels of land former mayor Annette Groves prematurely rezoned using her strong mayor powers, opening the door to 35,000 new homes — three times the provincial target — with little public consultation.
As he passed the intersection of Queen and King streets in Bolton, Axworthy recalled standing there with Groves in 2022, protesting Highway 413.
“And now she’s been out there with Doug Ford saying this is the greatest thing; we need this,” he said. He paused, before continuing: “I voted for her.”
In the 2022 municipal election, voters were desperate for change, having witnessed the damage done by previous mayor Allan Thompson, who had quietly pushed warehouse development in the Greenbelt, violating several environmental and land-use planning policies.
Thompson was part of a majority group of pro-development council members that included Jennifer Innis. Both of their families have significant land interests and will profit handsomely from the construction of sprawling subdivisions on vast tracts of farmland.
Innis ran for mayor in 2022 to replace Thompson, with his blessing, but was quickly confronted by a fierce anti-sprawl, anti-413 Highway, anti-freight village campaign that swept Groves into the mayor’s office.
Groves and Innis had opposed each other on growth-related votes for more than a decade, and the rookie mayor vowed four years ago to make good on her sacred campaign vow to keep development in check and protect Caledon’s verdant stretches of beloved greenspace from rapacious developers. Groves seemed like an obvious choice to lead Caledon with diametrically opposing views to Innis: One promised more walkable communities, transit, climate-conscious planning and protection for rural and environmentally sensitive lands. The other favoured a more conventional suburban expansion, with sprawling subdivisions, car-dependent neighbourhoods and Highway 413 cutting through the Greenbelt.
“I will ensure that developers do not plan our community but the people plan our own community and our future,” Groves said, pledging “growth will pay for growth” and infrastructure will be “in place before development happens”.
Using her past record of voting on key council land use issues, she promised to continue pushing back against urban sprawl-inducing ministerial zoning orders (MZO). She described the provincial government tool that overrides local planning authority as an “undemocratic” approach that “circumvents the public process”. Groves said the use of MZOs leads to poor planning that favours private interests, pushing warehousing and distribution centers and a stifling “freight village” future for Caledon that would force large property tax increases.
Almost immediately after her election, with Caledon voters filled with hope for their future, Groves tore up her sacred promises and threw them in the dust bin.
Her four-year tenure was effectively managed by a group of powerful developers, who literally wrote Caledon’s planning policies, under Annette Groves’ name.
Following intense public backlash, Groves announced her retirement on April 24, leaving behind a “legacy undone by terrible decisions” that failed to guard the unique character of the rustic villages and hamlets and rolling spaces she once vowed to protect.
“They [council] gifted the Town of Caledon to the developers…She ran on a strong public interest platform, and to do the exact opposite was such a betrayal to so many people,” Cheryl Connors, running to be the next Councillor for Ward 4, told The Pointer.
“It also makes it really hard for anyone who wants to enter public service in the future because it feeds this jaded sentiment that politicians just say whatever it takes to get elected.”
In a move that stunned residents across Caledon who had just voted for her, Groves brought forward 13 bylaw amendments shortly after her election. Without any public consultation, the zoning changes would add about 100,000 residents to the town, more than doubling Caledon’s current population.
It was a jaw-dropping move that left the mayor’s supporters feeling utterly betrayed after they had been led to believe Groves would do the exact opposite. Instead of standing up to developers, she was suddenly taking her marching orders from them.
It was soon learned that the amendments Groves dropped from nowhere onto the legislative agenda had not been written by planning staff governed by the Town’s official plan and the Region of Peel’s growth master plans. They were written by a development lawyer representing one of the building consortiums that stands to make huge profits from the construction of residential subdivisions.
Axworthy shook his head that day, two weeks ago. He recalled the faith he put in Groves. He continued driving along Columbia Way toward the A8 parcel, one of the dozen that was eventually approved for massive new development. He passed the site without realizing it—something was different.
“Is that a new building?” He seemed astounded, his eyes wide with confusion.
The once-green, open farmland had become ‘unrecognizable’, with trees cleared away to make room for a Solmar development office suddenly standing next to the road.
“It was completely different.”
Just as a bulldozer’s engine rumbled on the site, its warning beeps piercing the air, its metal bucket scraping and digging into the ground, Bolton resident Marnie Singleton, who lives steps away from the A8 parcel, joined Axworthy.
Singleton, who has lived in the area since 2009, recently retired. After years of work and time spent away from home, she was looking forward to enjoying the changing fall colours from her window: “That’s always been a beautiful part of my life.”
She had little idea what was coming until one day while driving home, she noticed that the row of trees on the A8 parcel had disappeared.
“That broke my heart.”
“I know it will provide homes for a lot of people…I just don’t understand why they have to take the trees down outside the tree line or outside the fence line.”
Her biggest concern? “Losing farmland”.
While she understands Caledon needs new housing to accommodate the projected 300,000 residents by 2051, Singleton questions whether the town’s existing infrastructure can cope with the cumulative demands of development.
“Further down this road is the Townline between Caledon and Vaughan, and there’s an intersection there that they’re [Town staff] predicting is going to be overwhelmed by the volume of traffic that this site [A8] is going to create,” Axworthy noted.
There is already congestion along Townline Road and Highway 50 “in the mornings”, especially, Singleton added. “Add snow to that mix? It’s a recipe for a disaster”.
“They are going to add 122,000 people to Caledon, a town that currently is 80,000…the road infrastructure as it exists, there are bottlenecks with 80,000,” Axworthy added.
On October 19, he headed to the final mayoral debate hosted by the Caledon Chamber of Commerce at Caesar’s Centre in Bolton, and settled in a chair, ready with a pen and notebook to take notes.
For 45 years, Caledon’s rolling hills, wildlife and a deep love for the community have shaped his life. In 2024, he decided to volunteer with Democracy Caledon, a non-profit advocacy group formed to oppose Groves’ use of strong mayor powers and council fast-tracking large-scale urban development and pre-zoning agricultural land without heeding public concerns.
Many residents now face a difficult choice at the ballot box after Groves’ turbulent tenure and retreat from her promise not to sell Caledon to developers: council veterans Christina Early and Mario Russo, or newcomers Alan Hart, Jagdeep Sacha and Manjit Bhondhi Saini.
“This election is going to be a turning point for this town,” Axworthy said.
“If Russo wins, what we love about Caledon is gone.”
The seeds of his frustration were sown in June 2024 when council voted on the 12 zoning bylaw amendments, drafted by developer lawyer Quinto Annibale, paving nearly 5,000 acres of agricultural land, the largest development plan in Caledon’s history.
Russo was among the councillors who voted in favour of the amendments despite the Region of Peel estimating that servicing 13,000 housing units alone (about a third of what Groves forced through for the developers who wrote her 12 approved amendments) would cost approximately $6.2 billion for water infrastructure and $6.7 billion for wastewater infrastructure.
There was no fiscal plan completed to determine who will pay for this infrastructure or the impact it could have on Caledon taxpayers who may be forced to pay for the maligned plan, which has been compared to the PC government’s Greenbelt scandal that has been under RCMP investigation for over three years.
Only councillors Lynn Kiernan, Dave Sheen and Christina Early opposed the bylaws.
Early was asked about the 35,000 new units pushed through by Groves and a majority of council members earlier this term and if she would change course as mayor.
“Approving 26 years of growth in one term of Council without ensuring the necessary infrastructure is in place was not a decision I could support,” Early told The Pointer.
“We cannot simply reverse decisions already made, but we can ensure future decisions are better planned, financially responsible and made with residents’ interests first."
It’s unclear why she would not reverse the decision, which Caledon residents overwhelmingly rejected. It would be well within her power as mayor to tear up the 12 amendments Groves pushed through to build 35,000 new homes.
“Growth should strengthen our communities, not overwhelm them,” Early said.
Russo was asked the same, regarding his decision to support the 35,000 new homes and whether he would make a decision on the issue differently as mayor.
“Yes, I will support slowing or delaying further approvals and development phases where infrastructure cannot support them,” he said.
“I will use holding provisions, subdivision conditions and development agreements where legally available to tie development to demonstrated servicing and road capacity.”
Former minister of municipal affairs and housing Paul Calandra, the Region of Peel and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority all stated the pre-zoning was premature.
Town staff reassured the bylaws included holding provisions that require future secondary plans, infrastructure servicing confirmations, and environmental studies before the legislation can be ratified into official planning policy, triggering construction.
“I supported the June 2024 zoning by-laws, with holds,” Russo said.
“Those lands were already inside Caledon’s urban boundary or existing settlement areas. Further planning and servicing requirements remained after the zoning approvals.”
Critics who reject Russo’s stance, that a terrible, developer-driven decision which he supported can now somehow be responsibly controlled, saw the vote as a starting point for a 4–5 voting bloc.
Residents want the bylaw amendments torn up. Full stop.
In December 2024, Democracy Caledon filed a notice of application against the Town of Caledon in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice challenging the zoning bylaws for violating section 24 of Ontario’s Planning Act and section 273 of the Municipal Act, 2001 by failing to conform to the official plans of Caledon and the Region of Peel. The group had their hearing in May this year; Justice Rosemarie Juginovic did not issue a decision, instead reserving her ruling, which could take several months.
In less than two weeks, the motion was voted on, after only three residents were able to voice their concerns during a public question period with only Sheen, Kiernan, de Boer and Early opposing.
Among the council members who voted in favour, Ward 5 councillor Tony Rosa received a $1,200 campaign contribution from Nicola Cortellucci. Ward 1 Councillor Christina Early received the same amount (she voted alongside the residents in opposition), according to the Town’s 2022 candidate results and financial statements.
Early said her 2026 campaign is not being funded by developers, unlike the 2022 municipal elections when she received $14,900 (42.4 percent) from donors connected to the development and construction industry, according to A Better Caledon report card prepared by Caledon resident Katherine Wilson. For Russo, the share was higher: 57.6 percent.
“In May 2025, I supported the amended motion establishing a conditional process requiring studies, public consultation and a further report to Council before an agreement could be entered into,” Russo explained.
Two months later, the Town proposed to revise its fill bylaw—a connection that many saw as more than just a coincidence.
The existing fill bylaw restrictions made Swan Lake, zoned extractive industrial, ineligible for a fill permit.
On the other hand, the Town’s draft Site Alteration Bylaw, meant to modernize the 18-year-old fill regulations, included ambiguous language with frequent use of “may” and “shall,” a fragmented public notification process, all of which undermine clarity and public engagement while giving the commissioners of engineering, public works and transportation the power to approve permits, decide if public meetings are required and override Council approval for large projects.
After months of media reports, fierce public pressure, packed Town Hall meetings and provincial support for Swan Lake by Liberal MPP Ted Hsu, council temporarily halted the plan to allow the developer to fill the lake with construction waste following a motion brought forward by Russo.
Both him and Early committed to opposing filling Swan Lake and will not be supporting the proposal’s revival.
“The next mayor has to do their job and work for the constituents of Caledon,” Belain Farm owner Anna de Langley, whose property borders Swan Lake, told The Pointer.
“We don’t want any more strong mayor powers. We don't want flip-flopping on things like the 413. We want someone that actually cares about the residents, and cares about the farmland and will protect it.
“It's like the mistakes of the farmers 30 years ago that sold to all these aggregate people and developers; now it's all coming to fruition, and we’re the ones paying the price.”
During the debate, all five candidates stated that they reject the use of strong mayor powers.
Early and Russo also say they oppose the proposed CBM blasting quarry that plans to extract up to 2.5 million tonnes of limestone, sand, and gravel annually from below the water table using controlled blasting—completely altering the landscape in the town, already scarred by the aggregate industry’s moonscapes and trucks that jam roads throughout the town.
In April, Early successfully put forward a motion proposing to update a 2024 vibrations and nuisance bylaw and build stricter noise standards to protect residents and businesses 24 hours a day from loud vibrations from industrial sites, pits and quarries rather than only during designated nighttime hours; it was unanimously approved.
However, the decision was in direct contrast to Early’s 2020 vote in favour of a pit expansion — the James Dick/Erin pit, which doubled an existing pit in Erin and eventually encroached into Caledon.
She said she did not believe she had voted for the pit expansion while defending the EA as a ‘potential good decision’, adding that she recused herself from related matters due to her family’s property being affected by the proposed highway corridor—however, that was after voting to fast-track the assessment.
A year later, when Russo was serving as Regional Councillor for Wards 4, 5 and 6, he voted against a motion to disavow former mayor Allan Thompson for securing a provincial zoning order for a 502-acre warehouse development (that engulfed six homes) without council or public support—Early voted in favour. However, both of them opposed a motion seeking records of communications between Thompson, Town staff and the province about MZOs from July to December 2022.
In 2023, they were also among five councillors who refused to reverse a 25 percent pay increase (motion brought forward by Groves), which raised councillors’ salaries from $40,080 to $49,841 — an increase ten times the average rate of inflation at the time.
During the debate, mayoral candidate Jagdeep Sacha said he has heard residents complain about “very high” taxes already; he plans to address that by focusing on generating employment and business opportunities.
Manjit Bhondhi Saini wants to do a line-by-line budget review to protect taxpayers and essential services, and identify infrastructure gaps tied to approved growth, if elected.
Alan Hart argued that a fresh pair of eyes and leadership is exactly what Caledon needs to avoid being “known as the warehouse and trucking hub of Canada”.
Early wants to shift Caledon’s current approach from logistics to attracting commercial businesses while creating “complete communities” and easing barriers for agritourism—an area where Russo wants to invest as well, with the addition of investment in research and development, healthcare and post-secondary education instead of ‘pigeonholing’.
Despite being one of the GTA’s fastest-growing municipalities, Caledon remains car-dependent, with limited public transit and heavy trucks hauling concrete and aggregate along its roads — traffic that has claimed residents’ lives and left families fearing for the safety of their loved ones.
When Connors asked if any of the candidates would impose a moratorium on further truck-dependent industrial development until measurable safety improvements are in place, Early and Russo stopped short of committing to one, instead pointing to infrastructure upgrades, truck enforcement and local traffic solutions. They also pledged to address congestion along Highway 50.
“I believe the province should seriously examine how Highway 407 could be better utilized to relieve congestion across the region,” Early added.
As Caledon heads toward election day on October 26, a simmering undercurrent of discontent has hardened into a deep community divide as Early and Russo supporters trade accusations—rooted in a fear of preventing a “Groves 2.0”.
Candidates were also asked how they planned to prevent a potential 73 percent tax increase for Caledon households — $80 million annually in new costs — when 1,620 kilometres of regional roads are transferred to the Town of Caledon on July 1, 2027.
Russo believes Caledon “should not accept” a transfer that would cripple the town financially; the province must adequately “subsidize” to cover the costs as the population grows, especially since the roads serve traffic beyond Caledon’s borders for movement of goods.
“I joke that I might have to put a border crossing or a literal turnstile at Mayfield Road and Highway 9,” Russo said.
Early targetted Mississauga Mayor Carolyn Parrish’s claims that she would save $30 million and use those savings to help keep taxes down. While there has been discussion about the province subsidizing municipalities, municipalities don’t know what those figures would be yet.
“I do not think we have a complete picture of what the July 2027 transition will look like,” she said, noting that CAOs are still crunching those numbers.
“I would be lying if I told you I could say exactly what the financial impact would look like right now.”
She argues the first priority must be to determine the total costs and financial implications, and then work with both Brampton and Mississauga as well as Queen’s Park to ensure the transition can happen without placing an unreasonable burden on taxpayers.
Whoever fate and voters have in store for Caledon, ecoCaledon co-secretary Betty de Groot wants the “next mayor to know that this is a community that cares, that has their eyes open and is alert to what the environment needs”.
“We don’t like being outwinked. We like honesty…the way things have gone, especially in that last term, we don't like to be lied to,” she told The Pointer.
“We want to know what we’re signing up for, and we want to believe in the people’s word even after the election.”
Former Ward 1 councillor Lynn Kiernan, who is not seeking re-election, reflected on her eight years in office that gave her a “ringside seat” to “one of the most consequential and difficult periods in Caledon’s municipal history” — “a clear example of why Caledon needs a change of leadership”.
“I have watched our community confront extraordinary growth pressures, significant changes in provincial policy, the introduction of strong-mayor powers and a changing relationship between Council and senior administration,” she said in a statement.
“I have also seen something more troubling: a deterioration in the respect and collegiality that should underpin good local government.
“In my view, this culture was set and supported by Mayor Groves and [her hire] CAO Nathan Hyde.”
She criticized the former mayor for fostering a culture that discouraged dissent and marginalized councillors who challenged decisions.
Kiernan observed a majority voting bloc was becoming a means of silencing opposition rather than advancing policy. At times, she experienced it too.
“Residents should not be fooled again by promises of accountability, collaboration and respect if the conduct and culture of the past four years are allowed to continue,” she said.
“Caledon will continue to grow and change. There will be difficult votes and passionate disagreements. That is democracy. But respect should never depend upon agreement.
“Public service should be demanding. It should never have to be demeaning.”
Email: anushka.yadav@thepointer.com
At a time when vital public information is needed by everyone, The Pointer has taken down our paywall on all stories to ensure every resident of Brampton, Mississauga and Niagara has access to the facts. For those who are able, we encourage you to consider a subscription. This will help us report on important public interest issues the community needs to know about now more than ever. You can register for a 30-day free trial HERE. Thereafter, The Pointer will charge $10 a month and you can cancel any time right on the website. Thank you
Copyright 2026, The Pointer. All rights reserved.
Anushka Yadav, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Pointer.
Keep reading
Show less
How AI allegations led Quebec author from prestigious awards to losing his publisher
Timeline of AI allegations around Thélyson Orélien
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout — Francois Couture (Mandatory Credit)
A few weeks ago, Haitian-born Quebec author Thélyson Orélien was collecting award nominations as his book topped bestseller lists. Then, allegations that he used artificial intelligence to write his debut novel, “C’était ça ou mourir” (“It was either that or dying”), started cropping up.
On Wednesday, his Quebec publisher announced it was cutting ties with the author after it found evidence it says indicates he used artificial intelligence to write his book.
Here is a timeline of the rise of Orélien’s book and the mounting accusations that followed.
2017: Orélien said he began writing his book in 2017 in Laval, north of Montreal.
The book follows a Haitian man forced to flee his country and make a perilous journey through the Americas to Quebec. The story is based on Orélien's own experience leaving Haiti after the 2010 earthquake, the author has said.
2019: Orélien said he finished the first draft of more than 300 pages, two years later.
Sept. 12, 2025: Les Éditions du Boréal said it received the manuscript of “C’était ça ou mourir." The publisher later said it couldn't verify the allegations about the book's writing process before that date.
March 9, 2026: “C’était ça ou mourir” is published in Quebec. It was published in France a few weeks later and set to be translated into over 20 languages, according to French publisher Éditions Grasset.
Sept. 2: “C’était ça ou mourir” is among 16 nominees for the Prix Goncourt, one of France’s most prestigious literary awards.
Sept. 21: Grasset announces the author has won France’s Prix du Roman Fnac, a literary award chosen by a jury of 400 booksellers and 400 readers.
That same day, the X account “Balance ton Claude” alleges that, according to Pangram software, excerpts of Orélien’s novel had been written “almost entirely by artificial intelligence.”
Sept. 22: Orélien denies AI use in a joint press release with his Quebec publisher. The author says his writing style comes from Haiti's literary tradition, “where poetry, images, repetitions and rhythm carry a living speech."
The publisher defends Orélien and denounces statements that “directly damage the author’s reputation.”
Sept. 23: Separate plagiarism allegations emerge as media outlet La Presse publishes an article outlining passages in articles attributed to Orélien and published in Quebec and French media between 2012 and 2014 that were near-identical to previously-published work by other authors.
Sept. 24: Boréal says it is concerned about the plagiarism allegations and suspends promotional activities surrounding Orélien’s novel, citing the author’s well-being. The publisher says it is working with the author to compile a detailed record of his writing process.
The Salon du livre de l’Estrie, a book fair in Sherbrooke, Que., announces it is removing Orélien as a guest of honour after learning of the plagiarism allegations.
That same day, French literary online magazine ActuaLitté publishes an article about a 2023 text on Orélien’s blog which included a sentence that looks like an AI prompt.
Sept. 25: The Académie Goncourt removes “C’était ça ou mourir” from consideration for the Prix Goncourt. The academy cites analyses it considered credible and the separate plagiarism allegations involving Orélien’s previous work.
Orélien declines to respond to the new allegations or provide further comment. “I can’t talk about it. I want to focus on my physical and mental health,” he says in a WhatsApp message to The Canadian Press.
Oct. 13: In a statement, Orélien admits that he plagiarized some of his earlier work and apologizes for making what he described as unacceptable mistakes in his youth. “Admiration does not give you the right to take, to claim as your own texts that are not yours,” he writes.
However, he denies using AI to write his debut novel, saying no sentence was generated by a machine. He adds that he used AI tools for research, for instance to look up foreign-language expressions.
“What I am going through is cruel,” he writes. “By attributing a text, one that is mine...to a machine, they have not only called into question my status as a writer but also my humanity.”
Oct. 14: Boréal condemned Orélien’s plagiarism but said it stood by the author amid the AI allegations and would keep the book on shelves. It said it had no evidence beyond the author’s word to determine how the novel was written.
“The publisher’s role is not to demand proof from authors, but to stand by them, and that is what we are doing,” the publishing house said.
Oct. 17: Boréal confirms Orélien has dropped his efforts to compile evidence he did not use AI to write his novel. “That decision is his to make, and we accept it, although we certainly would have preferred to be able to provide definitive answers to the allegations of AI use against him,” co-director Renaud Roussel wrote in an email to The Canadian Press.
At the time, Roussel said the publisher’s position on the affair had not changed. A new printing was expected the following week.
Oct. 21: Boréal announces it cut ties with Orélien. The publishing house says it found evidence, through an analysis of some documents' metadata, that Orélien used AI to write his book.
The publisher said it will not reprint the book or publish more books by Orélien.
“We still do not know to what extent AI was used in the creation of ‘C’était ça ou mourir,’ and we will likely never have a definitive answer,” it wrote.
— With files from Charlotte Glorieux
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 22, 2026.
By Marieke Glorieux-Stryckman | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Keep reading
Show less
Former Alberta cabinet minister says Smith can't survive UCP crisis after referendum
Smith can't survive Alberta referendum: Guthrie
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson.
A former Alberta cabinet minister says Premier Danielle Smith won't survive the crisis in her United Conservative Party amid fallout from the separation referendum.
Peter Guthrie, who was removed from the UCP caucus after criticizing the government over a health-care procurement scandal, now leads the upstart Progressive Tory Party of Alberta.
He says Monday's referendum angered both federalists and separatists and leaves Smith with more enemies than supporters.
About 75 per cent of voters cast ballots to keep Alberta in Canada and not to have a second, binding referendum on leaving the country.
Smith's office says Guthrie is out of touch with Albertans and peddling misinformation.
On Wednesday, the premier said anyone running for or speaking for her UCP must accept its pro-Canada stance.
She said separatists intent on turning the party into a vehicle for independence should join a different party, warning internal division could cost the UCP next year's election.
By Lisa Johnson | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Keep reading
Show less
6 vidéos d'OD qu'Éloïse aurait pu regarder sur YouTube lors de son isolement
Le public doit maintenant assimiler tous les événements survenus lors de l'épisode d'OD du dimanche 25 octobre. Entre les pleurs de Karine, le départ de Julie, et la tentative de baiser manquée de Kiki, c'est définitivement la tricherie d'Éloïse d'OD qui a suscité le plus de réactions.
La candidate a avoué avoir regardé des vidéos YouTube à propos de l'émission lorsqu'elle était en confinement suite aux quelques symptômes qu'elle avait eus pouvant s'apparenter à la COVID-19.
Éloïse est revenu dans l'aventure en bonne santé, mais surtout, avec des informations que les autres candidats n'avaient pas sur la saison d'Occupation Double Chez Nous.
Elle n'a mentionné que quelques détails qu'elle avait appris. Toutefois, on se demande si elle a tout dit quant à ses trouvailles.
Voici six vidéos à propos de l'aventure d'OD sur lesquelles elle aurait pu tomber lorsqu'elle a triché.
La sélection de l'éditeur : Noovo confirme qu'il y aura des conséquences pour Éloïse à Occupation Double
Claudie et Mathieu commentent les portraits des candidats d'OD Chez Nous
Dans cette vidéo, le couple de Claudie et Mathieu, ex-candidats d'OD Afrique du Sud 2019, commente les portraits des nouveaux candidats.
Claudie annonce simplement qu'elle aime bien Charles, après avoir vu sa présentation.
Laura-Gabriel montre sa réaction à la première d'OD Chez Nous
La youtubeuse, et ancienne candidate d'OD, commente la première d'Occupation Double Chez Nous. Elle y regarde le tapis rouge et les réactions des candidats.
Chris Negrowski commente le tapis rouge
Le youtubeur commente les présentations des filles sur le tapis rouge lors de la première d'OD Chez Nous. Il dit trouver les candidats moins intéressants que les autres années.
Chris Negrowski a fait, depuis, d'autres vidéos auxquelles Éloïse aurait pu avoir accès.
Le youtubeur sous le nom du Maire de Laval a fait plusieurs vidéos critiquant Charles
Le youtubeur est convaincu qu'Éloïse est allée voir ses vidéos, car il est l'un de ceux qui parlent le plus en mal de Charles sur YouTube.
Sa vidéo Charles doit partir de OD Chez Nous MTN a obtenu plus de 37 000 vues.
Claudie et Mathieu commente une soirée d'élimination
Une autre vidéo de Claudie et Mathieu était sortie lorsqu'Éloïse a eu accès à YouTube.
Elle aurait pu voir les deux tourtereaux commenter l'épisode de l'élimination de Martine.
Alicia Bernier donne son avis sur les candidats
La youtubeuse parle clairement dans sa vidéo de la rumeur qui circulait selon laquelle Charles aurait fait les auditions d'OD lorsqu'il était encore en couple.
Mis à part Charles, Alicia n'a que des bons mots pour les autres candidats de la maison des gars.