Three B.C. party leaders to face off in only televised debate of election
The leaders of British Columbia's three main parties are to face off today in their only debate of the snap provincial election.
NDP Leader David Eby, interim Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson and Green Leader Emily Lowan are to debate from 6:15 p.m. to 8 p.m., with all major television and radio networks broadcasting the event to be moderated by Angus Reid Institute president Shachi Kurl.
The debate comes after the Greens released their platform for the Oct. 24 election on Tuesday afternoon.
It promises new initiatives in health care, education and other social services worth almost $9.3 billion per year over the next two fiscal years, with new revenue coming from a one-time tax on "excessive wealth."
The party says the new levy would raise $22.2 billion in its first year and total additional revenue would top out at $25.3 billion in 2027-28
The Greens say their fiscal plan would raise an additional $9.14 billion in revenue from 2028-29 through higher taxes on the wealthiest British Columbians and nobody "who works for an income" would pay a single dollar more in tax than they currently do.
The Greens are the first party recognized in the legislature to release their platform, and their leader says it is an ambitious plan to transform B.C.
"It is a plan that looks beyond the failures of the status quo and beyond the wishes of the multinational corporations that have had a stranglehold on B.C. for far too long," Lowan says.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 14, 2026.
Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
David Eby was B.C.'s political giant-killer. But has he overplayed his hand?
Politics, like curling, is all about geometry.
Cameras swirl around New Democrat Leader David Eby as he uses a broom to mark a spot on the ice at the Victoria Curling Club. “Hurry hard, Richard,” he yells at candidate Richard Zussman down the ice.
Zussman's stone ends up nowhere near the proposed target, Eby stopping it with his right foot.
“Good sweeping,” Zussman says.
The question now is whether Eby's political calculations have similarly slid awry, as he faces a largely unknown opponent in interim B.C. Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson, whose sudden elevation has sent the election's stones ricocheting in unexpected directions. Eby called the snap Oct. 24 election just two days after Doerkson was installed.
When Eby first raised the possibility of a snap election in early September less than two years into his mandate, the Conservatives were undergoing self-immolation, suffering near-daily defections under the divisive reign of Kerry-Lynne Findlay.
But on Sept. 20, Findlay resigned.
It would go down as a hinge date in B.C. politics
That evening, NDP legislators met with campaign chair Cheryl Oates to discuss election plans in light of Findlay's exit. Later the same night, the Conservatives' board appointed Doerkson as interim leader, and he immediately set about persuading former Conservatives back to the party's caucus, including seven out of eight who had announced they were joining CentreBC days earlier.
With Findlay gone and the Conservatives coalescing, Eby nevertheless went ahead with the election call on Sept. 22. The question is why.
"The decision to go to an election was a serious one, and so is the moment, we face as a province," Eby said in an interview, betraying no hint of regret with the NDP lagging the Conservatives in recent polls.
"The decisive piece was for me whether or not we had a legislature to work, whether or not people had representatives that were actually going to stand up for what the priorities in the community were."
New Democrats held a one-seat majority with 47 seats at dissolution.
Former B.C. Liberal Mike de Jong, who served more than 30 years in the legislature, would have advised against an early election.
The NDP barely beat a "ragtag group" of Conservatives in 2024, he said, and there was a risk of being seen as manipulating the electoral process "purely for self-advantage" at a time when the Official Opposition was without a permanent leader, he said.
De Jong also pointed out the risk that an election call could unite the free-enterprise coalition.
He said Eby was "supremely confident in his own political instincts and his own political instincts, and his own political judgment."
"If it doesn’t turn out, it will be regarded as the biggest political blunder in this country, never mind this province, and that will be, for better or worse, within the NDP in particular, his legacy,” he said.
Eby’s biography shows no aversion to risk.
In 2011, when then premier Christy Clark needed a seat in the legislature after becoming leader of the B.C. Liberals, then 33-year-old Eby agreed to run and came within 564 votes of beating her.
Two years later, he reversed the result and cemented his reputation as a political giant-killer, beating Clark in a rematch.
Eby considered a leadership run after the NDP lost the 2013 provincial election. But he ruled himself out when he announced the pregnancy of wife his, Cailey Lynch, a doctor, with their first child, Ezra. They now have three children, with the addition of daughters Iva and Gwendolyn.

Eby’s political responsibilities grew after the NDP regained power in 2017 under John Horgan, the late premier who routinely tapped him to handle difficult files, from housing to the remaking of auto insurer ICBC.
When Horgan stepped down, Eby became premier in 2022, in an uncontested race after activist Anjali Appadurai was disqualified.
Former federal NDP MP Megan Leslie, who attended the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University with Eby, says his upbringing in a suburban cul-de-sac home shaped him.
Eby was born in Kitchener, Ont., in 1976, the eldest of four children, whose father was a personal injury lawyer, and whose mother was a high school principal.
She said Eby’s father encouraged neighbours to create and maintain a communal space. “It’s incredibly special because the neighbourhood has self-organized to make sure that there are no fences in their backyards."
As a teenager, Eby protested the treatment of elephants when the circus came to town, and he is a vegetarian.
Eby and Leslie's friendship dates back to orientation at law school during a bus trip to Peggy’s Cove. "I sat beside this really tall guy," she said. Eby is six-foot-seven.
Leslie shared her doubts about going to law school. “He said, 'well, I feel the same way. So, I bet there are other people who feel like this too. So, why don’t we start an activist club?’”
Leslie said this was the origin of the Social Activist Law Student Association.
"Dave challenged us," she said.
But she said Eby also had fun while at law school. He expanded Leslie's musical tastes, downloading music through Napster, and they performed karaoke together — Eby was "really good" at Whitney Houston’s "Greatest Love of All," and they also performed the B-52’s "Love Shack" as a duet, involving a feather boa.
"Guilty as charged," Eby said of Leslie's account.
Eby also sang and played guitar for Vancouver-based bands including Ladner and World of Science. He had permanently moved to the city in the early 2000s.
After graduation, Eby articled for the federal Department of Justice in Vancouver, before joining Pivot Legal Society in 2005, located in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside to offer legal support to one of Canada's poorest neighbourhoods.
In 2008, he joined the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association as executive director. Former president Robert Holmes said Eby’s impact was immediate.
"He managed to get the office humming and everybody working on their specific projects," he said. "Plus, he was in the news an awful lot."
This energy differentiated Eby. "He had drive and energy directed to the job at hand, and he pursued that," said Holmes
But Clark thinks Eby "has a real execution problem.”
"I don’t think I have ever seen a politician, who is so bad at delivering results," she said.
Clark and De Jong point to B.C.'s projected deficit of almost $14 billion — Eby inherited a surplus from Horgan. De Jong said Eby’s handling of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act has been "clumsy" at best.
"I think he wishes to contribute positively to the province," de Jong said. "I don't agree with many of the pathways he has take, but I have never questioned his motivation."
Clark warned against counting Eby out.
"I always thought of David Eby as a very serious opponent in the fight," Clark said. "I have never thought of him as a serious person when it comes to governing, but when it comes to elections, he’s a very tough opponent."
Eby himself said the race is continually shifting. He said he would wait to see what election day brings, when asked if he would stay on as leader of the NDP after a loss.
"If this province is anything, it is a province that pays attention and makes important decisions in key moments," he said.
"I have faith in the voters of B.C. to set us on the right track, and that is why I’m putting the question in front of them."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 14, 2026.
By Wolfgang Depner | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
More than half of doctors surveyed would leave an independent Alberta: medical group
Hundreds of physicians would not practise in Alberta if the province leaves Confederation, a survey by the organization that represents doctors in the province indicates.
Of the 1,649 physicians surveyed by the Alberta Medical Association, 15 per cent said they would continue living and practising in Alberta if it became an independent country, and less than a quarter were uncertain about what they would do.
Those who would elect to leave said they would move to another Canadian province or territory, while a small percentage would retire or leave the medical field earlier than planned.
The survey results were published Tuesday in a letter released by the association's president Dr. Heidi Fell, which was the first of five days of advanced voting on separation ahead of the official referendum day on Oct. 19.
"As Albertans prepare to vote, the AMA is focused on an important question," Fell said in the letter. "What could the referendum outcomes mean for patients, physicians and Alberta’s health-care system?"
Premier Danielle Smith's United Conservative Party government has put 10 questions on the ballot. The 10th question asks whether the province should stay in Canada or hold a second, binding referendum on leaving the country.
The first nine questions are about Canada's Constitution, as well as immigration, including whether the government should impose limitations and financial fees for newcomers and temporary workers accessing health care.
The AMA said if Albertans choose to separate, not only would the medical workforce shrink, but health care in an independent Alberta would be left in limbo.
Fell said it's unclear, for example, how an independent Alberta would fill the health-care funding gap that would be created after it loses federal money.
"In addition to assuming federal health-care funding responsibilities, significant health-care concerns remain, including maintaining access to medicines, equipment and medical services," she said.

The association also has questions about the effects of the immigration questions on health care, Fell said, should the government receive a mandate on them.
Fell said she wrote to the province's health ministers last week for more clarity.
She has asked them, for example, what doctors should do when someone needs necessary care but their eligibility can't immediately be confirmed.
She has also asked how questions about eligibility should be resolved without delaying care.
"Physicians often need to make clinical decisions before a patient’s identity, residency status or coverage can be verified," she said.
"Our position is straightforward: uncertainty about coverage should not unnecessarily delay care, and physicians and their staff should not be placed in the position of determining or enforcing a patient’s immigration or coverage status."
Fell said the AMA hopes to hear from the government soon.
"Ultimately, we believe questions about coverage should be addressed through a reliable and timely administrative process so physicians can remain focused on clinical decisions and patients can receive the care they need."
Hospitals Minister Adriana LaGrange's office said it is reviewing the association's letter.
"It would be inappropriate to speculate on the outcome of the referendum or any technical legislative, policy or program changes that may follow until Albertans have had their say," her office said in an email Tuesday.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 14, 2026.
By Fakiha Baig | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

La prod de STAT répond aux comparaisons à « District 31» et « Grey’s Anatomy »
La nouvelle quotidienne reçoit encore des critiques. 👀
La nouvelle quotidienne de Radio-Canada, STAT, fait encore bien des remous sur les réseaux sociaux. Après que les téléspectateur.trices aient critiqué les « erreurs médicales » ainsi que la prononciation des comédien.nes, les fans comparent aussi la série àDistrict 31 ainsi qu'à Grey's Anatomy, ce à quoi la production a répondu.
Ce n'est pas la première fois que la prod répond, alors qu'elle avait déjà abordé la question de la vraisemblance du milieu médical à l'émission. L'équipe avait donc expliqué que certaines décisions sont prises pour respecter la logistique de tournage. Cette fois, les responsables des réseaux sociaux de la série ont donné leur avis au sujet des comparaisons faites avec l'émission policière qui occupait la plage horaire avant celle-ci.
Tout a commencé quand, une fois de plus, des membres du public ont relevé des incohérences entre la réalité et l'organisation de l'hôpital St-Vincent. Un.e internaute a notamment relevé le fait que le personnage de Ludivine Reding, qui est infirmière en salle d'urgence, assiste aussi en salle d'opération, ce qui ne serait pas plausible :
« Je vais lâcher ça... fiction trop grossière [...]. Il y a beaucoup d'intrigues, mais les " conseillers experts médicaux " sont à côté [de] la coche trop souvent. »
« Ce n'est pas une erreur, c'est un choix lié à la réalité du nombre de comédiens qu'on peut avoir sur le plateau, et l'ensemble du projet. On ne peut pas avoir un rôle pour chaque poste, ce sont des choix narratifs. Ça ne change rien à l'histoire, au contraire, ça permet de suivre plus en profondeur chacun des personnages, au lieu de s'éparpiller sur 20 ou 25 histoires. », a alors écrit la production.« District 31 n’avait pas beaucoup de staff, mais les gestes posés étaient plus réels! », a écrit un.e fan, introduisant ainsi la comparaison avec l'émission chouchou de plusieurs Québécois.es.
« Les gestes étaient pas mal moins complexes et beaucoup moins nombreux. Tenir un pistolet, mettre des menottes, ça se résumait pas mal à ça, en termes de geste. Le reste, c'était des propos techniques au texte. Bon épisode! » , a rétorqué la production.
Lorsqu'une autre personne a comparé STAT à la populaire série médicale américaine Grey's Anatomy, la production a récidivé en expliquant les différences selon leur point de vue.
« Je comprends l’enjeu du [nombre] d’acteurs et de budget pour tout le staff et les unités de soins… mais appart les acteurs qui ont des personnages et personnalités attachantes... Il est vrai de dire qu['il y] a [beaucoup] « d’erreurs » qui sont terriblement loin de la réalité et qui me font réagir et décrocher à de nombreuses occasions moi aussi! Je vous jure que j’essaie tant que je peux, mais….(#onestloindeGreysAnatomy!)», a écrit un.e téléspectateur.trice.
« Grey's Anatomy n'est pas une quotidienne, et surtout elle n'a pas les mêmes enveloppes budgétaires. Ce serait bien de garder ça en tête...», a répondu l'équipe derrière la page Facebook de STAT.
« Oui je sais tout ça! Mais quand même... [Il y] a une méchante différence… même à côté de District ou j’ai embarqué tout de suite ! #fullaccro! Mais là… J’aime les personnages, mais [il y] a [quelque chose] qui cloche... À suivre ! », a dit un.e fan suite au commentaire de la production.
« Hiiii boboy [il y en] a une méchante gang qui [n'a] pas encore compris c'est quoi de la fiction... pour ma part j'adore vraiment beaucoup. »
« Formidable l'épisode [du] lundi 3 octobre, pour moi A+. »
Même si certain.es démontrent leur mécontentement, d'autres ne se gênent pas pour commenter à quel point iels aiment la série et les comédien.nes, qui font du bon travail.