FR - Choses à faire
Une vente de vêtements et accessoires de designers québécois débarque à Montréal
Ce n'est qu'une seule journée!
Don't have an account?
By continuing, you agree to our Terms & Conditions
Please check your e-mail to reset your password.


We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Learn More
Posts questioning the results in Alberta's referendum spread on the social media platform X this week as the numbers were released. One claimed that hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were dumped to answer just one of the questions put to voters — the 10th question asking about independence. Another concluded more people had voted than the number of registered voters. Elections Alberta and one expert say the people making these claims either misunderstood or deliberately misrepresented the vote-counting process.
THE CLAIM
An Oct. 20 post on X alleged that hundreds of thousands of special ballots were dumped to tilt the outcome of the independence referendum question in favour of Alberta remaining in Canada.
“Look at the dump of mail in votes for the Alberta Referendum. Almost all ... the mail in ballots appear to only have answered question 10," it said, posting screenshots of live preliminary results for each referendum question from the Elections Alberta site. The figures in the screenshot showed substantially more votes tallied for the independence question than for the others.
"That smells of corruption," the post, which had received close to 67,000 views hours it was posted, continued.
THE FACTS
Duane Bratt, a professor of political science at Mount Royal University in Calgary, described the claim about a mail-in ballot dump as "ridiculous."
He said the sudden appearance of the results for the independence question after the polls closed was expected, as the government had said results for that question would be announced first, and workers had begun counting the ballots hours before polls closed.
"They had been counting the advanced polls and the mail-in votes since 5 o'clock that afternoon, so it's not surprising that there was a whole bunch of results, the moment that they could officially release them," Bratt said.
Bratt referred to Elections Alberta releasing the initial results for the question minutes after the last poll closed, with the results showing a sizable lead for Alberta remaining in Canada over the option of a referendum on leaving the country.
Soon afterwards, the results for the remaining questions also began to trickle out.
In an emailed statement Tuesday from Elections Alberta, the office said that there was no mail-in ballot dump, and that they had announced the order in which results would be released on May 29.
The office added that it received 519,082 special ballots on the independence question. The Elections Alberta live results web page on Wednesday showed 2,021,521 total votes cast for this question, with 95 per cent of locations reporting.
"This allegation now is disinformation at best and an attempt to deliberately undermine faith in the democratic process at worst," an Elections Alberta spokesperson said.
Bratt added that, while the polling stations workers were counting the ballots for the independence question, they would also count the ballots for the remaining questions.
"In each polling station, they counted Question 10 first, then they went through one to nine. That is why there was a discrepancy, and there continues to be a discrepancy in the totals that emerged," he said in an interview Tuesday.
Bratt added that another reason for the discrepancy was that some voters may have found the wording of the remaining questions confusing and skipped them, and others were encouraged to vote only on the independence question. Voters were free to answer as many referendum question as they chose.
"If you were to vote in person, you don't have to take all 10, you don't have to drop off all 10. It's the same thing with the special ballots," he said. "You could submit one ballot or you could submit 10 ballots."
THE CLAIM
Another Oct. 20 post on X questioned the number of votes processed compared to the number of eligible voters, appearing to equate each valid vote cast with a voter and alleging there might be an "election fraud."
"Elections Alberta noted in advance that the province had 3,148,343 eligible voters," the post said. "The problem is that the numbers below add up to 4,352,679 votes cast."
The post, which received more than 190,000 views in the hours after it appeared, claimed there were 1.2 million more votes than eligible voters, adding that it was hard to believe 100 per cent of eligible voters took part in the referendum.
THE FACTS
Elections Alberta's referendum results website provides a clear distinction between the number of eligible voters and the number of votes cast.
The vote total represents "valid votes cast across 10 questions," in which each ballot submitted counts as one vote. For this referendum, each voter received 10 ballots, one for each question, so in theory the maximum number of votes cast is 10 times the number of voters.
The official results for all 10 questions are expected to be released and finalized on Oct. 29, according to the web page.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 21, 2026.
By Timon Johnson | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
An anti-racism organization is calling for an investigation into how Ontario's provincial police force assesses new recruits, as three Black recruits allege they faced racial discrimination during their year of probation.
The Black Class Action Secretariat says it wants the province's inspector general of policing to examine Ontario Provincial Police probationary evaluation and coaching practices as well as probationary outcome data across the force to look for racial disparities.
The group's director of advocacy says that while the OPP has an internal office that aims to ensure its policies and practices are inclusive, "the question is whether that commitment reaches the coach officer's notebook, the probation file, and the release decisions."
In a news conference today at the provincial legislature, Alain Babineau said there are people within police ranks quietly deciding "who belongs in uniform and who does not."
The call for an investigation comes as the non-profit says three Black recruits stationed in different regions faced a "strikingly similar pattern of discrimination." The OPP says it's looking into those concerns.
The secretariat says the recruits, who are sharing the allegations under pseudonyms under fear of reprisals, were mocked and penalized for their accents and communication styles and disciplined for behaviours common among white officers.
Two of the recruits were dismissed before the end of their probation period, while the other remains on medical leave, the group said.
A spokesperson for the OPP said the force acknowledges the concerns raised by the Black Class Action Secretariat on behalf of the three recruits.
"We take these matters seriously and are reviewing the various concerns brought forth," Staff Sgt. Joe Brisebois said in an email.
The force can't comment on specifics when it comes to employment-related matters, he said.
"What we can say is that the OPP is dedicated to ensuring open, accessible, equitable and respectful workplaces, and is committed to reflecting the diverse communities it serves," as well as ensuring a workplace that fosters a safe and inclusive environment, he said.
"We do not condone or tolerate discrimination or harassment of any kind."
The Inspectorate of Policing, an independent oversight office that opened in 2024, acknowledged The Canadian Press's request for comment Wednesday but did not immediately provide one.
One of the recruits, who used the pseudonym Paul, said Wednesday he has two master's degrees and excelled at the police college, but found himself ridiculed and judged for the way he spoke after joining a detachment in the province's southeast.
"I caught my coach officer and my colleagues ridiculing me. A dispatcher joked on the record about my accent affecting a radio call," he said, phoning into the news conference.
"When I tried to discuss it, it was used against me," he said.
Paul said he was one of three Black officers in his detachment and was released from his position after 10 months. The experience changed his career, he said, adding he is "still trying to heal from the mistreatment and discrimination."
Another of the recruits going by the pseudonym Peter said he "immediately felt isolated" after reporting for duty at a detachment in central Ontario.
"My sergeant would make fun of how I pronounced some words, asking me to repeat things in front of my colleagues so everyone could laugh," he said in a call played at the news conference.
"I wasn't coached at all, it just felt like I was being watched to be documented."
Peter said he was reprimanded for using his phone's GPS to navigate the city when it was a "common practice" among his white colleagues.
The stress eventually caught up with him, and he went on medical leave in the spring, questioning whether to continue on this career path, he said.
Organizers also shared a statement on behalf of the third recruit, who went by the name John. John said he spent a decade in the human service field before becoming an officer, and was stationed at a detachment in southwestern Ontario — the only Black recruit in his platoon.
"I felt there was no trust or confidence in me from Day One," the statement said. "It felt like not only did they expect me to fail, they wanted me to fail."
He also faced reprimand for using his phone GPS when others were doing the same without issue, and at one point had his driving privileges taken away without explanation, he said.
John said he was let go two weeks before the end of his probation, on grounds that he was not a good fit. "What it really meant was that I didn't belong, that they didn't see me as one of them, that they didn't want me there," he said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 21, 2026.
By Paola Loriggio | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Ce n'est pas ton Wi-Fi qui fait défaut. 👀
Si tu as essayé de payer ta facture d'Hydro-Québec, de planifier un trajet sur le site de la STM ou de commander une bouteille sur le site de la SAQ ce mercredi 21 octobre, tu as probablement vu apparaître une page d’erreur. Ce n'est pas un hasard : plusieurs organisations québécoises et canadiennes ont fermé leur site par précaution à cause d'une faille de sécurité mondiale.
À lire également : Les services secrets recrutent des employés au Québec qui parlent l'une de ces 6 langues
En cause : PHP, un outil informatique invisible pour toi, mais qui fait fonctionner une bonne partie des sites que tu visites chaque jour. La PHP Foundation, qui gère son développement, a publié un correctif mercredi à 10 h (heure du Québec) et presse tous ceux et celles qui l'utilisent de faire la mise à jour sans attendre, selon son communiqué.
Concrètement, les deux vulnérabilités critiques découvertes dans PHP pourraient permettre à un pirate d’exécuter ses propres commandes sur un serveur à distance, sans même avoir besoin d’un mot de passe. La PHP Foundation leur a attribué une note de gravité de 9,2 sur 10.
Tant que chaque organisation n'a pas installé la mise à jour, son site risque de rester fermé.
Le gouvernement fédéral a d'ailleurs mis certains de ses sites hors ligne, suivant les directives du Centre canadien pour la cybersécurité. « Il s’agit d’un problème global, et d’autres gouvernements et organisations prennent eux aussi des mesures de protection », a écrit sur X Evan Solomon, ministre fédéral de l’Intelligence artificielle.

Au moment d’écrire ces lignes, ces sites étaient inaccessibles en tout ou en partie :
Pour quelques heures, tu ne pourras peut-être pas payer ta facture d’Hydro-Québec, planifier un trajet sur le site de la STM ou faire certaines démarches en ligne. Rien n’indique que tes données aient été piratées : les fermetures sont une mesure de précaution.
Aucune heure de retour n’avait été annoncée au moment d’écrire ces lignes. Le ministre Solomon assure que les sites touchés reviendront dès que les correctifs seront appliqués : « Nous prenons cette situation extrêmement au sérieux. Nous remercions les équipes de cybersécurité qui travaillent à protéger les services sur lesquels les Canadiens comptent. »
Si ta démarche est urgente, passe par le téléphone ou en personne.
Il est également conseillé de te méfier des courriels et des textos qui te demandent de cliquer sur un lien pour « mettre ton compte à jour ». Attends que le site officiel soit de retour.