“Leadership,” Alvin Tedjo answered.
“Trust,” Dipika Damerla said, pointing to the declining “quality of life”.
“Affordability,” Crombie said.
Parrish, who was absent, chose to participate in only three mayoral debates while continuing to attend local community events and respond to residents on social media—similar to her approach in the previous municipal election.
In a poll taken the same day, residents picked affordability, housing and taxes as their top three election issues. Another survey found housing affordability is a central issue for voters across the GTA—69 percent say it would influence their vote and 82 percent believe municipalities are not doing enough to address the crisis.
But where does the problem stem from?
While broad economic and political storms have coalesced to create the ongoing affordability crisis, another storm, quite literally, has intensified those pressures, but it has been conspicuously absent from the local debates.
Climate change impacts almost every aspect of municipal government and the residents who rely on City Hall for flood and storm management, reducing local emissions from bus fleets and municipal buildings, safeguarding watersheds, managing land use in sustainable ways and ensuring public spaces provide natural outlets that help the physical and mental health of residents.
Despite all the direct connections between local government and its environmental gatekeeper role, voters often look past these critical functions.
“The disconnect was always surprising,” Harvard University assistant professor of economics Adrien Bilal said.
In 2024 — the warmest year on record (1.46–1.49° Celsius) —, Bilal teamed up with Northwestern University economist Diego R. Känzig to rethink conventional estimates of climate change’s economic toll; the two found a direct correlation between the two and projected every additional 1°Celsius (C) rise in global temperatures could reduce global gross domestic product by 12 percent, six times the losses estimated by previous research.
That same year, Mississauga recorded the highest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of any Peel municipality, releasing 6.7 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO₂eq) — substantially more than Brampton’s 4 million tonnes and Caledon’s 671,151 tonnes.
Mississauga was also battered by two once-in-a-century storms that summer, which left residents stranded with flooded basements, damaged vehicles and costly repairs, with many left to shoulder expenses not covered by insurance and, eventually, a high insurance premium.
In 2021, American economist Sean Becketti theorized the climate crisis as the domino that disrupted property values, mortgage defaults, insurance costs and the stability of the housing finance industry: Physical risks, including flooding and extreme weather, were not being adequately reflected in market valuations, raising red flags about whether lenders, insurers and governments are prepared for climate change’s financial consequences.
The aftermath of the 2024 flooding illustrated the theory in practice: even while carrying the immense emotional and financial toll, residents continued delegating at City Hall, pushing for stormwater upgrades and better flood mitigation, prompting intense, prolonged discussions among council members.
Since 2016, Mississauga has poured over $200 million into stormwater infrastructure with plans to invest $365 million by 2034; however, an additional $30 million per year from 2025 to 2124 is required to fully fund the City’s stormwater program and maintain aging stormwater pipes, according to a 2020 staff analysis.
During budget deliberations in November 2024, City staff warned the City’s stormwater reserves could be depleted by 2026 without additional revenue and suggested raising the stormwater charge in future years.
Before passing a sweeping suite of policies (including expediting major stormwater initiatives like the Dixie-Dundas Flood Mitigation Project) to protect residents and combat future flood risks in September 2024, Mayor Parrish complained about being “left to dry” by Queen’s Park and Ottawa to shoulder the cost of the storm.
“We’re starting to be tired of being the poor cousins,” she told The Pointer previously.
In April 2025, 128 municipal leaders, including Tedjo, issued an open letter to federal party leaders urging climate-focused action to strengthen Canada’s resilience in the face of natural disasters.
If elected mayor, he intends to continue pressing provincial and federal governments for infrastructure funding while prioritizing floodplain protection, stormwater management and upgrades to prevent flooding.
“Other municipalities, including Brampton, have successfully secured significant funding for infrastructure improvements, and Mississauga must actively pursue these same opportunities,” he told The Pointer.
A recent United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report stresses that in a warming world set to cross the 1.5°C threshold within the next few years, 70 percent of climate solutions depend on local and subnational action; inculcating mitigation and adaptation measures in local policies will be key to navigating climate-fueled disasters.
The report asks municipal governments to revise zoning laws, building codes and infrastructure to withstand rising climate risks; invest in nature-based solutions like urban trees and green spaces to reduce local temperatures; strengthen heat-warning systems and cooling infrastructure; and cut emissions through better waste management, clean energy and electrified transportation.
“Mississauga should continue seeking its fair share of provincial and federal funding, but that cannot become an excuse to delay decisions within our own control,” Crombie said.
“The City controls its budget, municipal buildings, local roads, stormwater investments, purchasing decisions and much of the planning that shapes how our community grows.”
She supports integrating climate resilience into routine asset management and budget decisions, starting with prioritizing flood protection in the capital budget, improving transit service, making municipal buildings more energy-efficient and using land-use planning to create communities “where people have practical alternatives to driving”.
Tedjo agrees Mississauga can take meaningful action on climate resilience and sustainability “without waiting for other levels of government”.
“For too long, progress on our climate commitments has been slow. I am committed to meeting Mississauga’s existing climate targets and ensuring the City takes meaningful action to achieve them,” he told The Pointer.
The City of Mississauga declared a climate emergency in June 2019 after a group of middle school students from Camilla Road Senior Public School made a deputation to council; it also led to the adoption of the Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) that included a 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions from 1990 levels.
In June, Mississauga’s Climate Policy Supervisor, Carrah Bullock, reported that 95 percent of the 89 actions outlined in Mississauga’s 2019 CCAP have either been completed or are underway: 13 actions have been completed, 46 have been completed but remain ongoing through continuous improvement efforts and 26 are currently underway.
However, Mississauga resident and Youth Climate Corps’ Executive Director, Bushra Asghar, who has watched water creep across her parents’ basement floors almost every rainy season, feels the climate plan is “performative”.
“They’re meeting 95 percent of their calls to action while failing to meet all their emissions. It’s a bit greenwashy,” she told The Pointer.
“What they’re doing is creating tasks that they can checkmark. But what are the actual reductions in emissions in real time? At this pace, how many years behind are you on the pathway to meeting your own targets?”
While Crombie takes pride in Mississauga declaring a climate emergency during her tenure as mayor, she firmly believes “a declaration and a plan must be followed by implementation” — which she intends to do by translating climate targets into actionable decisions on transit, buildings, land use and the City’s own operations, if elected again.
“In my first budget year, I would bring forward an implementation schedule identifying the actions, costs and expected emissions reductions needed to advance that target, with annual public reporting on progress,” she told The Pointer
“Residents should be able to see what has been funded, what has been completed and where we are falling behind.”
An “important part of that work” is her transportation plan that aims to make transit a “practical choice” by improving MiWay bus services, getting the Hazel McCallion Line open and advancing a connected regional network—while tackling the second-highest source of GHG emissions in the municipality.
Previously, she spearheaded the City’s departure from purchasing conventional diesel buses in 2019 and steadily replacing them with hybrid-electric and zero-emission alternatives.
In September 2024, Mississauga became the first Ontario municipality to pilot 10 hydrogen fuel cell electric buses, expected to be on the road next year, as part of its public transit fleet.
“If we’re going to be smart about climate change, we need to start looking into alternatives to diesel for our growing transit fleet and start investing in cleaner fuels and technologies,” Parrish said.
“[It] will advance our understanding of hydrogen fuel and what it means for sustainable transportation options in the future. We’re committed to looking for innovative and low-emission solutions to reach our goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Mississauga by 40 percent by 2030.”
The total cost of the $25.4 million project is being shared between the City ($14.4 million) and Ottawa ($11 million).
That decision doesn’t sit right with Damerla, who estimates the higher cost of hydrogen fuel could add $3 million annually over the buses’ 20-year lifespan, amounting to $60 million in additional costs.
“The problem with those buses is that it’s untested technology, and we actually don’t know whether they reduce greenhouse gases,” she said during The Pointer’s latest ‘Ballot Vox’ episode.
“Why are we doing a pilot on the backs of the City of Mississauga property taxpayers?...let the federal government fund it.”
A proponent of a value-for-money audit, her campaign has largely focused on scrutinizing each spending item at City Hall to reduce the ballooned property tax (4.39 percent for this year).
“Every week, we say yes to some new spending. No one’s saying how does this all add up, and then we do all of these things that sound very high-minded…we’re gonna do a free app for everybody or we’re gonna save the environment,” she said.
Tedjo contends one of Mississauga’s biggest challenges is communities built “around car dependency rather than investing in more sustainable transportation options and walkable neighbourhoods that can help reduce our carbon footprint”.
That reliance can be reduced by “transitioning our public transit fleet and municipal vehicles to electric alternatives, expanding access to EV charging infrastructure and encouraging greater adoption of electric vehicles”.
In 2024, Mississauga emerged as a leader in EV adoption in the Peel region with a 30 percent growth in registrations.
Parrish has been outspoken about her support for EVs as well—greenlighting the expansion of the city’s EV charging network with more than 170 connections in place; the decision was supported by Tedjo and Damerla both during the council vote.
Despite their differing perspectives on community mobility, Crombie, Damerla and Tedjo all believe flood protection must be a priority and Lisgar is among the “repeatedly affected neighbourhoods” that require urgent attention due to their vulnerability to repeated flooding.
“Our work has been too slow,” Damerla observed.
“The money is already earmarked. Let’s just get it going. So my first commitment would be to speed up the Lisgar pumping station.”
Crombie promises to give precedence to “clear public accounting of the pumping-station, drainage and downspout work already undertaken or planned, what remains outstanding and whether it is delivering the protection residents need”.
“Our capital planning must reflect increasingly severe rainfall,” she said, calling for greater investment in stormwater capacity, upgrades to existing infrastructure and nature-based solutions such as permeable surfaces, rain gardens and natural areas to reduce runoff.
A 2022 report from the Financial Accountability Office of Ontario endorsed higher-capacity systems and green infrastructure solutions like rain gardens, bioswales, and permeable surfaces as necessary since climate-induced rainfall could cost municipalities an additional $700 million annually just to maintain existing stormwater systems. Without immediate upgrades, overall infrastructure costs could rise by 27 percent.
Damerla believes incentives can play a crucial role in encouraging residents to reduce concrete surfaces on their properties and adopt measures such as “rain gardens” to help absorb stormwater and reduce flood risks.
As Ontario moves forward with the amalgamation of its 36 conservation authorities into nine regional bodies, Crombie deems it imperative that those sitting on council must strive to “preserve local expertise, flood forecasting and watershed management, with uninterrupted flood protection throughout the transition”. Experts have called the provincial takeover a “death knell for watersheds” as a result of reduced democratic representation in managing natural resources and an expected spike in local costs.
“Larger organizations must remain responsive to local conditions. Strong, properly resourced conservation authorities working across watersheds are essential partners in protecting Mississauga,” she noted.
Damerla advocated for the City to take a balanced approach to development in its pursuit of meeting the provincial housing target for Mississauga to construct 120,000 new units by 2031.
“Overdevelopment also results in flooding,” Damerla added.
“We have to address the housing shortage but we have to be smart about it, and we cannot be approving things that result in flooding.”
In 2024, Mississauga council voted unanimously in favour of green development standards (GDS) after the guidelines were first set in 2012 under Hazel McCallion’s leadership. The new updates established a three-tiered sustainability framework for new residential and non-residential site plan applications to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy efficiency.
However, the Doug Ford government steamrolled those efforts after the passage of Bill 17, Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act, in 2025, stripping Ontario municipalities of their ability to set independent GDS. In April this year, the province doubled down on those rollbacks through Bill 98, dubbed the Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, enforcing tighter restrictions on municipal green rules, EV parking mandates, bird-friendly glass requirements and green roof bylaws under the guise of spurring housing development and lowering construction costs.
According to the province’s housing tracker, those drastic legislative changes have done little to put more “shovels in the ground”; In 2024, Mississauga was behind its target with 3,496 homes completed against an annual target of 10,000—meeting just 34.96 percent of its goal.
“Maybe it’s a bit cheaper, but longer term, I think we pay more,” Damerla said.
Instead, she would support expanding passive housing, also known as Passivhaus, a science-based, German building performance standard designed to use 90 percent less energy for heating and cooling, as Mississauga continues to build more homes.
Buildings are the primary source of emissions in the city, and Crombie argues the needle can be moved by improving “the energy efficiency of municipal buildings and incorporating climate considerations into infrastructure and purchasing decisions”.
In 2023, Crombie also utilized her strong mayor powers to bypass a deadlocked city council vote to legalize “missing middle” or four-plexes citywide—a motion initially brought forward by Tedjo.
For Tedjo, building a “more resilient Mississauga” means bringing in funding: “As we plan for more housing and population growth, we must ensure our water and stormwater infrastructure can support that growth without putting existing neighbourhoods at greater risk.”
As the Vice Chair of the Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) Board of Directors, he also wants to expand urban “tree canopy by 30 percent over the next 10 years while creating more accessible green spaces, particularly in the central and northern parts of the city” — building on a sustainability plan he introduced in 2024.
For Lisgar residents, if the torrential downpours of 2024 weren’t enough, the following year brought another source of anxiety: a proposal for a large-scale data centre that could be among the largest data centres in the Greater Toronto Area.
In August 2025, Vaughan-based building consultants, Mainline Planning Services, submitted a Planning Justification Report to the City of Mississauga, on behalf of U.S.-based real estate firm Prologis, seeking approval for a Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval to facilitate a proposed two-storey data centre of approximately 220,015 square feet at the northwest corner of Tenth Line West and Argentia Road.
Seven months later, at a Planning and Development Committee meeting, City Planner Connor DiPietro explained that the applicant was seeking to change the property’s zoning from D8 development exception to E2 employment exception zones to accommodate the industrial buildings and data centre.
Since Mississauga’s Official Plan did not include a specific land-use designation for data centres, the proposed facility was classified as a warehousing use.
City staff recommended referring the applications back for further work, identifying outstanding issues ranging from natural hazards and building setbacks to entrance design, stormwater diversion, sanitary servicing, water demand, cooling systems, parking and zoning compliance.
Zoning applications were then unanimously referred back to staff for further refinement and resubmission.
“Whoever turns down Prologis; haven’t seen anybody yet,” Carolyn Parrish said after the vote.
As word spread of the proposal, residents expressed fear and a long list of questions about its potential effects on electricity demand, water consumption, noise, the environment and public health. On June 25, the City held a town hall at Erin Meadows Community Centre, drawing a packed room of residents from Wards 9 and 10 who wanted answers about the proposed development but many left without the clarity they had sought from the City and Prologis.
Amid extensive public outcry, on September 16, Mississauga council voted unanimously in favour of an interim control bylaw (ICBL), assuring residents they were heard “loud and clear” — imposing a one-year pause on new data centre developments as staff simultaneously studied the emerging sector and its impacts in its entirety.
Mayor Parrish chose to abstain from the ICBL vote, citing Robert’s Rules of Order and Bourinot’s Rules, which required her, as chair of the council meeting, to refrain from voting unless her vote was needed to break or create a tie.
During the POLICORNER debate, mayoral hopefuls were asked whether Mississauga should permanently restrict new large-scale data centres: Tedjo and Crombie said yes, while Damerla said no.
“I've been very, very clear that the moratorium is an opportunity to get the guardrails in place, and the biggest guardrails are electricity prices don’t go up, and we have all the evidence we need to make sure that noise is not a problem, and there’s no environmental or health impacts,” Damerla explained.
“So if we are able to put all those guardrails in place, then I am open to considering data centres. But if those issues are not addressed, then it’s a hard no.”
The Pointer asked the mayoral candidates how they would regulate data centre development once the ICBL ends.
“If those safeguards have not been established [after the one-year pause], I will push to introduce strict energy consumption limits to prevent excessive strain on our utilities,” Tedjo said.
“I will oppose any data centre development that increases utility costs for residents. Mississauga families should not be forced to pay higher bills to accommodate large-scale developments.”
Crombie would take the route of seeking “independent expert advice to inform the rules brought forward to Council before the moratorium expires” along with clear rules covering electricity and water use, emissions, cooling, noise and neighbourhood impacts.
“That assessment must include the cumulative effects of multiple facilities, rather than considering each application in isolation,” she added.
“We need to ask whether a proposed data centre represents the highest and best use of the land, what permanent jobs and economic benefits it would bring and whether those benefits justify its demands on electricity, water and infrastructure.”
She aims to ensure development-related costs aren’t passed on to taxpayers and residents have a meaningful say in data centre decisions with clear information about the “trade-offs” on hand. “Canadian data sovereignty and security must be part of that discussion as well,” she added.
Parallel to the data centre debate, the next individual who will be adorning the chain of office, representing Mississauga, might have to deal with the Ford government’s water and wastewater privatization plans—with Peel handpicked as the pilot testing ground.
In November 2025, Bill 60, the Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, was passed, giving the PCs sweeping authority over how water infrastructure is managed in Ontario.
The Act conferred on the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing the power to designate, by regulation, a corporation that is incorporated under the Business Corporations Act as a water and wastewater public corporation to provide water and sewage services on behalf of particular lower-tier municipalities. The corporations would have the “power to collect and impose fees or charges” from users, giving them control over water rates.
It allows the province to regulate the “issuance of shares of a corporation” and “the composition of the board of directors”, raising apprehensions about who owns and controls these entities.
If required, corporations must submit a “rate plan that establishes the rates” charged to users that the Minister can approve, reject or require changes to.
“Our government is piloting a new publicly owned water and wastewater delivery model in Peel Region to save homebuyers money,” Daniel Strauss, a spokesperson for housing minister Rob Flack, told The Star.
“Publicly owned municipal service corporations will be wholly owned by municipalities, not private entities. Our legislation gives municipalities more tools to respond to growth pressures — all while maintaining strong local oversight.”
But legal experts note the government’s claims that the model guarantees public ownership do not hold up under scrutiny.
“There’s nothing in the legislation itself that requires the shares of these corporations to be owned by the municipality that creates it, or own public sector entity,” Goldblatt Partners lawyer and Partner Simon Archer, who was engaged by the Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario (CUPE) to analyze the legislation, said during a press conference.
“The word public in the name of these corporations does not have any real legal effect.”
Crombie said “essential” water and wastewater services must remain publicly owned and “accountable to the communities they serve”.
“Before supporting a new delivery model, I would want a public comparison of its costs, financing arrangements and implications for household bills against the existing system,” she added.
“I would advocate for open rate-setting, independent audits and clear reporting on operating costs, debt and infrastructure investment…Keeping bills affordable also requires responsible long-term planning. We cannot allow maintenance to be deferred until it becomes an expensive emergency, nor should residents face unnecessary costs arising from restructuring.
Any necessary rate increases should be publicly justified and accompanied by targeted assistance for residents who need it.
Both Damerla and Tedjo also “firmly oppose” privatization; while Damerla is open to working with the province to prevent water and wastewater services from falling into private hands, Tedjo urged Queen’s Park to adequately fund municipal water infrastructure, “without placing additional financial burdens on residents”.
Email: anushka.yadav@thepointer.com
At a time when vital public information is needed by everyone, The Pointer has taken down our paywall on all stories to ensure every resident of Brampton, Mississauga and Niagara has access to the facts. For those who are able, we encourage you to consider a subscription. This will help us report on important public interest issues the community needs to know about now more than ever. You can register for a 30-day free trial HERE. Thereafter, The Pointer will charge $10 a month and you can cancel any time right on the website. Thank you
Copyright 2026, The Pointer. All rights reserved.
Anushka Yadav, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Pointer.
