FR - Nouvelles
Vanessa Pilon annonce le sexe de son bébé dans une publication trop mignonne
Est-ce que c'est un garçon ou une fille?
Don't have an account?
By continuing, you agree to our Terms & Conditions
Please check your e-mail to reset your password.


We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. Learn More
It takes an average of just six weeks for opposing forces to develop a countermeasure to new technology deployed on the battlefield in Ukraine.
That rapid pace of innovation, driven by drones and robotics, is forcing NATO and its member countries to rethink how they acquire military equipment, while raising questions about whether international law can keep up with modern warfare.
The Canadian Press witnessed this technological race firsthand in Latvia, where Canada leads a NATO multinational brigade.
On Aug. 13, in a field near Selija in southwestern Latvia, the country's prime minister, Andris Kulbergs, and Defence Minister Raivis Melnis gathered with military officials and representatives from 27 NATO countries, including Canada.
Under cloudy skies, a drone sped overhead before another aircraft suddenly appeared behind it. The second drone, an NS3 interceptor capable of reaching speeds of 350 kilometres per hour, placed an explosive charge on the target drone, destroying it.
The dignitaries applauded. For manufacturer DK Unity, the demonstration was a success.
The company was among dozens of drone manufacturers participating in Baltic Trust, an exercise attended by 375 industry representatives hoping to persuade NATO military officials to purchase their technology.
The exercise took place as Latvia faced repeated drone incursions suspected of originating from Russia and Belarus.
Aleksandrs Stupans, DK Unity's business development manager, said the company relies on constant feedback from Ukrainian soldiers to improve its products.
"We have all this technology developed with weekly reference from the battlefield because we have our partner company in Kyiv, in Ukraine, and they are working with more than 100 different battle units," he said.
Some of the company's drones are already being deployed in Ukraine.
The six-week turnaround was documented in a recent analysis by a French parliamentary committee on foreign affairs and defence.
Janis Kazocins, an expert at the Riga Centre for Geopolitical Studies and former national security adviser to Latvia's president, said armies that adapt quickly gain an advantage.
The constant need to develop new countermeasures requires close collaboration between soldiers, scientists and private companies.
He recalled how Ukrainian forces developed an effective system to detect Russian drones by sound and shoot them down using heavy machine guns.
"And then the Russians simply started flying them through at 400 metres higher, and the bullets didn't reach that far," he said.
The problem, he explained, is that while the hardware is relatively simple, software and communications systems are evolving so quickly that what works today may no longer work in six or eight weeks.
He warned NATO countries against assuming they could simply purchase large quantities of Ukraine's most effective drones and store them in preparation for a potential Russian attack.
"The most dangerous thing to do is to imagine that we now know how drones or robotics work," he said.
"We need to buy a service, something which is developing all the time, to which we need to contribute our technology as well."
At the Ādaži military base in Latvia, Canadian Col. David Brassard, commander of NATO's multinational brigade, said his unit is modernizing its procurement procedures to become more agile and respond to rapidly evolving technology.
He said innovation no longer comes exclusively from factories but increasingly from soldiers on the front lines.
Ukrainian troops, for example, use computer programming and 3D printers to modify drones directly on the battlefield, adapting them to emerging threats.
Brassard acknowledged that NATO forces in Latvia have not yet reached the same level of adaptability as Ukrainian troops but expressed confidence they would get there.
Kazocins prefers the term "robots" to "drones," noting that unmanned vehicles increasingly operate on land and at sea, not just in the air.
Ukrainian forces, for example, are deploying autonomous maritime platforms, including the seven-metre-long Magura MV1, which reportedly can operate for seven days at sea and carry a payload of 2,200 kilograms.
"The Ukrainians are now using seaborne autonomous platforms, to bring in drones which fly off from these platforms and attack in Black Sea in the Crimean and the Russian coast," Kazocins said.
He compared the technological transformation to the shift from cavalry and horse-drawn transport to mechanized vehicles and tanks between the two world wars.
Artificial intelligence is also enabling the development of drone swarms, which the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research describes as systems in which multiple robots coordinate their actions to accomplish a common objective.
Kazocins said such tactics are already being used in Ukraine, where groups of drones carry out different missions, with some serving as decoys, others conducting surveillance and others carrying out attacks.
The operations rely on "very sophisticated software" and "very sophisticated communications technology," he said.
On April 13, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that his forces had captured an enemy position exclusively using unmanned ground vehicles and explosive drones, in what he described as a first in the war. He said the operation was carried out without Ukrainian casualties.
Zelensky also said Ukrainian unmanned ground vehicles had completed more than 22,000 frontline missions in three months, describing each mission as a life saved.
The growing use of autonomous weapons is raising concerns among international organizations.

In a joint appeal published Aug. 25, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and International Committee of the Red Cross President Mirjana Spoljaric urged countries to establish rules ensuring technological advances do not outpace international humanitarian law.
They warned that the autonomous targeting of human beings by machines risks crossing a moral red line.
The warning came ahead of discussions in Geneva, where countries have been examining ways to regulate lethal autonomous weapons systems.
Over the past three years, the 65 countries participating in the Conference on Disarmament have examined ways to regulate lethal autonomous weapons systems.
A report on the issue is expected at the seventh review conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, scheduled for November.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2026.
This report was produced with support from the Fonds québécois en journalisme international.
By Stéphane Blais | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
American Democrats living in Canada are prepared to shout their political choices from the rooftops ahead of next month's midterm elections — while some of those who back Republican candidates seem leery of speaking out fearing a backlash from their neighbours.
Tammy Wilsker Mermelstein, a Texas voter who moved to the Greater Toronto Area last year, will be voting in a U.S. election from Canada for the first time.
While she used to be a Republican and voted that way until 2016, Wilsker Mermelstein said she has never voted for U.S. President Donald Trump. She said it's crucial for people to vote this year as "Texas is in play."
"Texas has not elected a Democrat in high office for at least two decades, probably longer, and this is the first solid chance," she said. "They say every vote counts. This is really going to be an election where every vote matters, even in states where people aren't used to having their vote matter if they're in the minority."
Americans head to the polls on Nov. 3 for midterm elections which could see the Democrats seize control of both the Senate and the House of Representatives from the Republicans. Democratic control of one or both chambers could significantly alter the path of Trump's presidency, including the possibility of new impeachment proceedings against him, and investigations of some of his key allies and agency heads.
Expat participation in U.S. elections is typically low, though the Federal Voting Assistance Program estimates there were more than 430,000 eligible U.S. voters in Canada as of 2024.
The organization estimates turnout among Americans in Canada was about 10 per cent in the 2024 general election, while the domestic voting rate that year was about 76 per cent. The organization estimates the overall turnout among all eligible overseas U.S. citizens at 11 per cent.
Kathryn Sikkink, a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School who has volunteered with the U.S. Vote Foundation, said participation in voting abroad may be low because some citizens find it difficult. Some, she said, don't even realize they're eligible to vote.
The U.S. Department of State website says U.S. citizens can get an absentee ballot by mail, email or fax, or by downloading it from the internet, though options vary by state.
Most U.S. citizens can vote absentee for federal office candidates in U.S. primary and general elections. Some states also allow U.S. citizens living abroad to vote for local and state office candidates, and on referendums.
Georganne Burke, the chapter lead for Republicans Overseas in Canada, said it has been a "contentious year" as Americans living in Canada have watched "the back and forth" between the two governments over trade.
"They want to make sure that whatever's going on in the States stays kind of healthy in case they have to go back home. So people, they are more engaged, I think, than they have in the past," she said.
A dual citizen, Burke moved back to the U.S. a few months ago after spending 38 years in Toronto and Ottawa.
A Republican and Trump supporter, Burke said she estimates there is a roughly three-to-one Democrat to Republican ratio among American expats living in Canada.
"I know that most Republicans are very motivated to vote," she said. "They're very quiet about it. They don't talk because they're not received in a very friendly way in Canada, which is kind of unfortunate.
"Democrats are also motivated to vote, especially if they're in one of those toss-up states, like Michigan."
When The Canadian Press sought to speak with various American voters via social media pages and message boards, lots of Democrats stepped forward. Not one Republican did.
Burke said it's a civic duty to vote in elections. She also said while some of the things Trump says and does make her "cringe," she focuses on his accomplishments.
"A lot of the thing that he has done in the United States have made a huge difference for Americans, including dealing with the border problem in Mexico," she said. "And I know it drives people crazy, but he is reshoring, as he puts it, American industry to the United States to employ Americans. That's his job."
Trump's trade war with Canada has become a leading ballot box issue in some key states ahead of the U.S. midterms.
Trump rapidly escalated his trade war and rhetoric against Canada after trade negotiations fell apart in August. The president signed an order to rename Lake Ontario as Lake America and the United States hit an array of Canadian goods with 50 per cent tariffs. A few weeks later, Ottawa responded with its own retaliatory duties.
Jessica Matwick, a dual citizen who lives in Ottawa and is involved with Democrats Abroad and Indivisible Ottawa, said every eligible voter should get out and vote "to put a stop to an unhinged administration and a legislative body that has abdicated their responsibility to keep the executive in check."
"The attacks on Canadian sovereignty and destructive tariff war are actions I cannot remain silent about," said Matwick, who moved back to Canada in late 2016 and votes in Virginia. "I still have family living in the U.S. and many friends who I am concerned about.
"My heart hurts knowing that the damage that has been done in a relatively short period of time will take years and years to repair."
Cody Littlefield, who moved to Canada from the U.S. in 2019 and now lives in Calgary, said he tries to vote in every election. A California voter, he said this election presents an opportunity for voters to send a message that what's happening in the U.S. "is not acceptable."
"The future of the country really matters to me," said Littlefield, adding that he and his family may eventually move back to the U.S.
"There are some people who will never go back and maybe they just really don't care about the domestic stuff, but I would say the foreign policy still does affect them."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 21, 2026.
By Catherine Morrison | Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Mounties in North Vancouver say 150 youth and their chaperones had to be rescued when the vessel they were on ran aground on a sandbar off Vancouver.
RCMP say the vessel was in Burrard Inlet on Friday night and was carrying the group on graduation cruise.
The RCMP's marine unit attended along with the Canadian Coast Guard.
Police say in a statement that those rescue efforts safely brought everyone ashore.
No injuries were reported.
Police say there were no signs of impairment but the cause of the grounding wasn't mentioned in the statement.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2026.
Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.