Immigration remains contentious in Alberta following referendum
The Alberta referendum results last week have been celebrated across Canada as a victory for national unity over separatism. With more than three-quarters of voters rejecting a move towards independence, the outcome has also been hailed as a political victory for Prime Minister Mark Carney.
But beneath the headlines lies a less reassuring result for Alberta's immigrants.
Unofficial returns showed the Yes side leading on eight of the nine other referendum questions, including all five concerning immigration and access to public services.
The votes could strengthen Premier Danielle Smith's as she seeks greater provincial control over immigration and restrictions on services for temporary residents.
For Alhan Arsal, a temporary resident from Bangladesh who is pursuing a master’s degree in international relations at the University of Calgary, the results were disappointing although the rejection of separation came as no surprise.
"I can hardly make ends meet as a student," he said. "Paying more for less health care would put many people off from coming here as students in the future."
Arsal said the results of the referendum "make me uneasy and solidify my conviction to leave the province after graduation."
New Canadian Media previously reported on growing unease among Alberta’s immigrants over the referendum and its anti-immigration rhetoric.
Mixed reactions
Dozie Anyaegbunam is a Calgary-based marketing professional and managing editor of The Newcomers. The online publication and podcast explore immigrant experiences in Canada.
Anyaegbunam said the results were "not that surprising, but nonetheless sad to see."
He said he had hoped the No side would prevail, particularly given how temporary residents — who account for less than 10 per cent of Alberta’s population — had been singled out during the referendum campaign.
"We have a lot of work to do about immigrants and their value to the system in every way," he said, describing newcomers as having been used as a "lightning rod" during the referendum campaign.
Imtiaz bin Hafiz, a lawyer who moved to Alberta from Bangladesh in November 2022 and took his citizenship oath on Oct. 21, said he was also unsurprised by the referendum outcome.
"I expected that a large portion of the people would be in favour of the immigration proposals," he said.
However, he pointed to the narrow margins. With roughly 52 to 55 per cent supporting several of the immigration proposals in the preliminary count, Alberta appeared deeply divided.
"In any case, the majority was in favour of the immigration proposals which will, in my opinion, legitimize these sentiments over immigration in the province," Hafiz said.
For Avnish Nanda, an Edmonton lawyer and co-founder of Our Alberta Advantage, a nonpartisan campaign opposing the referendum’s immigration proposals, the margins also raise questions about the strength of Smith's mandate.
He said the premier had sought overwhelming support for her reforms, while her government spent heavily promoting the referendum.
The province budgeted approximately $4 million for an advertising campaign that included television, radio, online advertising and a booklet mailed to every Alberta household. The government was also permitted to campaign for its preferred outcomes using public funds.
Still, the immigration questions passed by comparatively narrow margins.
"Given that the Alberta government outspent our campaign by 40 to one ... I think she lost," Nanda said.
"The No side may not have prevailed on the immigration questions by a few percentage points, but we went into Monday thinking we would be blown out, and we weren't."
Rhiannon Hoyle, Alberta NDP shadow minister for jobs, economy and trade, acknowledged that the Yes votes reflected genuine concerns about affordability, employment, health care and public services.
"Those concerns are real and deserve solutions," Hoyle said. "But let's be clear: immigrants didn't create Alberta's affordability crisis, and blaming newcomers won't fix it."
Hoyle, who is herself an immigrant, said the government must take responsibility for adequately funding and planning public services.
What happens next?
Anyaegbunam expects immigration to remain politically contentious.
"I don't think we're done with these sentiments," he said. "We'll probably see it used again in the coming election season, given how many people voted Yes on the immigration questions."
However, the referendum questions are non-binding, leaving the government to determine how to proceed.
Nanda fears Premier Smith will intensify her immigration agenda, further dividing the province.
"I think we're going to be deeply polarized around this issue, that's for sure."
Hoyle cautioned against interpreting the results as unconditional approval for the government's plans.
"A referendum is not a blank cheque for Danielle Smith to bypass the Constitution or pursue policies that could harm Albertans," she said.
"The government must explain what is legally achievable, what it will cost taxpayers and what the consequences will be for families, workers and businesses."
Manpreet Tiwana, vice-president of the Alberta Liberal Party and an immigrant, also emphasized the limits of provincial authority.
"Alberta has a role to play, but significant aspects of immigration remain under federal jurisdiction, so any proposed changes will require careful consideration and cooperation between both levels of government," Tiwana said.
Hoyle warned that additional financial barriers could discourage the temporary workers and skilled immigrants that Alberta's economy needs.
"Making it harder for them and their families to access essential services could drive away the very talent Alberta needs," she said.
Hafiz was reluctant to predict how lasting the referendum's influence would be.
"A lot of essential services are provided by immigrants,” he said. “Most people in business realize the importance of immigrants in the economy.
Copyright 2026, New Canadian Media. All rights reserved.
Mubin S. Khan, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, New Canadian Media.
Son says Canadian died in U.S. after declining hospital care due to deportation fear
The son of a Canadian woman who died after a fall at her home in Point Roberts, Wash., earlier this month says she refused to seek treatment as she feared she would be detained by U.S. authorities or prevented from returning to the country.
Dylan Adamson says his 61-year-old mother was afraid to leave the United States because immigration authorities had recently commenced deportation proceedings, alleging she illicitly voted in a state election in 2018.
Health care is limited in Point Roberts, which is cut off from the rest of the United States and accessible by land only by travelling through British Columbia, and Adamson says his mother, Paige Adamson, refused to be taken to a hospital because she feared being unable to return home due to the deportation action.
Adamson says he only learned of his mother's fall after speaking with a firefighter who attended the scene of her death last Sunday, within a week of the accident.
The fall came about a month after Paige Adamson, a U.S. permanent resident, was heading home from a birthday dinner in nearby Tsawwassen, B.C., when American border officials held her for hours and questioned her about voting in the country.
Dylan Adamson says his mother did not recall registering to vote or casting a ballot, and the ensuing deportation proceedings sent her into a "panic."
Adamson, who lives in B.C., says he's been told paramedics who saw his mother before her death said to her that she needed to go to a hospital, but she signed a form declining further care because she was afraid of crossing the border.
"I'm just at a loss. Just because of a vote, my mom is dead. Just because of a stupid technicality, my mom is dead."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2026.
Copyright 2026, The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Assisted living grant seeks to leverage community-level innovation
A pioneering way to deliver assisted living services could be percolating this minute in an Alberta outpost, the cabinet minister touting a new grant believes.
And a jolt of cash may be all that lies between that vision and better lives for more people in more places, said Nathan Neudorf, the minister of assisted living and social services.
"You never know where a great idea can come up," Neudorf said, as he explained the reasoning behind the $200-million Assisted Living Innovation Grant Program.
An approach developed in a small community could be “a really great idea and it’s working really well,” he said. “Can we replicate that across the province? That’s what we’re looking to do.”
Eligible businesses or groups need to gather their thoughts and materials soon to apply.
The deadline is 4 p.m. on Nov. 6 for proposals under an initial tranche of $50 million. Single-year projects will be considered for between $50,000 and $2 million, multi-year ones of up to three years for between $250,000 and $5 million.
Explained Neudorf: “What we need is a really good idea with some applicable information. Where is it going to be applied? How is it going to be applied? Why are you asking for the amount of money you're asking for?”
But he noted that proposals “can't be completely out of left field” and must be channeled through eligible organizations.
“Show us you can do it. We will evaluate it,” said Neudorf, who represents Lethbridge-East under the UCP banner. ”We think there are a lot of ideas out there.”
An information webinar happens this coming Tuesday, Oct. 27, from 2 to 3 p.m. And questions will be taken until 4 p.m. on Nov. 4.
Eligible projects might use technology like virtual and remote support services to help Albertans stay independent within their homes, the province suggests.
Novel approaches for supporting continuing care workers are fair game. So are community-based services that help support those receiving and giving care.
The program will also fund research into new approaches to improve care in ways that will work elsewhere, the government said in announcing the grant earlier this month.
A successful proposal “can look like a number of things, but at the end of the day, it's about Albertans having a better life for longer, wherever that might be for them,” said the minister.
Eligible organizations include non-profit, community and in certain cases for-profit groups involved in continuing, home and community care. Indigenous communities and organizations in Alberta, along with Alberta municipalities, are eligible.
Post-secondary and research institutions can make proposals that tap into the grant, too.
For-profit groups need to demonstrate innovation, education, system improvement or evidence generation in their proposals. Proposed spending must go beyond routine business.
Even if the province doesn’t get its money back in eventual savings, the program could prove successful, Neudorf said. The win would be that more Albertans who need care — many of them in the province’s ballooning contingent of senior citizens — receive it where and when it’s needed.
For rural and remote Alberta, that often means keeping older generations close or within their home communities for longer. Everyone benefits when seniors are nearby, the minister said.
“If kids just have to go down the road to see their grandparents, that’s great. They might stop in literally every day after school instead of only on certain weekends when they can make the trek to the big city,” Neudorf said.
Seniors connect communities and young people to a shared past, he said, and often put their experience and knowledge to work as volunteers.
Assisted living keeps jobs and care in rural Alberta, and “keeps the heartbeat alive, which is families and organizations."
For more information, visit alberta.ca and search for the Assisted Living Innovation Grant Program.
Copyright 2026, The Macleod Gazette. All rights reserved.
George Lee, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Macleod Gazette.

Ces plaques d'auto ont été refusées au Québec en 2022 et certaines sont épouvantables
Il y en a qui ont l'esprit tordu! 😲
Nul doute que les Québécois.es ont beaucoup d'imagination et cette liste de refus des demandes de plaques d'immatriculation personnalisées en est bien la preuve. Chaque année, des automobilistes de la Belle Province, désireux.euses d'orner leur voiture d'une plaque qui leur ressemble plus qu'un agencement aléatoire de chiffres et de lettres, tentent leur chance en envoyant leur proposition à la Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec (SAAQ).
Pour que ton idée soit acceptée, ce n'est pas chose si facile. Après ton envoi, les équipes de la SAAQ se penchent sur plusieurs critères afin d'évaluer si oui ou non ta plaque sera personnalisée comme tu le souhaites. Tu devras notamment t'assurer que la combinaison choisie n'exprime pas d'idées obscènes, scandaleuses ou de nature sexuelle, qu'elle n'utilise pas un langage abusif et qu'elle n'encourage pas une infraction criminelle. Tu devras aussi payer 272,49 $ pour les frais de changement, puis 37,66 $ par année.
Narcity a répertorié quelques-unes des 2725 combinaisons refusées les plus cocasses de 2022 dénichées sur une liste envoyée par la SAAQ. Et oui, tu vas vite t'apercevoir qu'il y a quelques petites thématiques qui semblent bien populaires chez les conducteurs et conductrices du Québec.
Marques de commerces
Les propriétaires de véhicule ne peuvent détenir « une plaque d'immatriculation qui renvoie à un nom distinctif utilisé comme marque de commerce enregistrée ». Cette consigne est inscrite bien clairement sur le formulaire de demande. Toutefois, certain.es tentent tout de même leur chance… Juste pour voir!
On a pu retrouver, entre autres, des noms d'entreprises bien connues telles que : VERSACE, AIRBNB, VISA, UBIS0FT, TWITTER, KIJIJI, AMAZ0N, Y0UP0RN et TINDER.
Les marques d'autres véhicules ont aussi été très populaires dans la dernière année avec P0RSCHE, TESLA, MUSTANG, T0Y0TA et plus encore. C'est sûr que de se promener en vieille Toyota Tercel avec une plaque FERRARI, c'est le comble de l'ironie.
Autres petites perles qui ouvriront certainement l'appétit aux automobilistes se trouvant à l'arrière de la voiture en question : 0RE0, TIMBITS et KFC. Tiens donc, j'ai une soudaine envie de poulet frit qui me tenaille!
Langage abusif et vulgaire
Peut-être en doutais-tu déjà, mais les « mauvais mots » et autres grossièretés ont la cote chez ceux et celles qui font des demandes de modification et ce n'est pas toujours très subtil. Parmi les nombreuses plaques refusées qui contiennent un langage abusif, voici celles qui se sont démarquées par leur candeur : WTFL0L, FUCKY0U, AZZH0LE, SXYMILF, CALISS, DATASS et le très chic 2FASTBK.
Une personne aurait même proposé FCKCOPS, ce qui semble être un moyen de s'attirer du trouble.
Film, télévision et musique
Plusieurs ont voulu se gâter un brin avec une plaque d'immatriculation qui fait référence à leurs films, chanteur.euses ou séries télévisées préférées. Hélas, ces propositions n'ont pas passé au conseil. Dans la liste on peut entre autres retrouver GANDALF, Y0SHI, P0KEM0N, MAD0NNA, JAGER, MINI0NS, NEM0 et AVENGER.
Voir une plaque écrite PIKACHU devant toi, c’est sûr que ça redonne le sourire, mais comme dirait un.e candidat.e au Banquier, c'est RE-FU-SÉ!
Infractions et actes criminels
Certaines personnes semblent avoir voulu mettre de l'avant leur penchant vers la criminalité. Est-ce pour appâter les forces de l'ordre? Sur la liste, les actes violents et les références à la mort sont nombreux : MURDER, MAFI0S0, DEATH, DEVIANT, PYR0MAN, KILLR, SANSL0I, CADAVR, M0RGUE, C0CAINE, PIMP1, ASSASIN, ILLEGAL.
La SAAQ est claire à ce sujet, le numéro choisi ne doit pas comporter une expression ou un message « qui encourage une infraction criminelle ».
Amoureux.euses de sports
On peut compter plusieurs fanatiques de sports parmi ceux et celles qui désirent une plaque d'immatriculation personnalisée. Avec des compositions comme WEBER, BRUINS, FIFA, WWE, LEBRON, PEEWEE et NASCAR on comprend que certain.es sont très fier.ères de leurs équipes et souhaitent le démontrer de toutes les manières.
Cependant, ce ne sera pas sur le derrière de leur véhicule, car le numéro de plaque ne doit pas laisser faussement croire que le propriétaire du véhicule routier est une autorité publique.